Tag Archives: Section 475

Uncertainty About Using QBI Tax Treatment For Traders

March 6, 2019 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

See our more recent blog post: A Rationale For Using QBI Tax Treatment For Traders.

Traders in securities and/or commodities, qualifying for trader tax status (TTS) as a sole proprietor, S-Corp, or partnership (including hedge funds), are wondering if they should use “qualified business income” (QBI) tax treatment on their 2018 tax returns. I see a rationale to include such treatment, but there are conflicts and unresolved questions, which renders it uncertain at this time. Section 199A QBI regs include “trading” as a “specified service trade or business” (SSTB), and QBI counts Section 475 ordinary income or loss. However, Section 199A’s interaction with 864(c) may override that and deny QBI tax treatment to U.S. resident traders.

QBI treatment might be an issue for all TTS traders, not just the ones who elected Section 475 ordinary income or loss. For example, a TTS sole proprietor trader filing a Schedule C would report business expenses as a QBI loss, which might reduce aggregate QBI from other activities, thereby reducing an overall QBI deduction. There are QBI loss carryovers, too.

Many TTS traders and hedge funds don’t want QBI tax treatment since they have not elected Section 475, and QBI excludes capital gains, Section 988 forex ordinary income, dividends, and interest income. Hedge fund accountants seem to prefer the Section 864 rationale to not use QBI treatment for TTS funds.

A partnership or S-Corp needs to report QBI items on Schedule K-1 lines for “Other Information,” in box 20 for partnerships and box 17 for S-Corps, including Section 199A income or loss, and related 199A factors like W-2 wages and qualified property.

With uncertainty over QBI tax treatment, traders should file 2018 tax extensions for partnerships and S-Corps by March 15, 2019, and extensions for individuals by April 15, 2019.

A 2019 Section 475 election is due by those extension deadlines. Section 475 gives tax loss insurance: Exemption on wash sale loss adjustments on securities and avoidance of the $3,000 capital loss limitation. There’s a chance traders might be entitled to a QBI deduction on 475 income, so factor that possibility into decision making. (See my recent blog on extensions and 475 elections.)

Section 864 might deny QBI treatment to TTS traders
I took a closer look at the confusing language in Section 199A’s interaction with Section 864(c), which might deny QBI treatment to TTS traders. Section 199A final regs imply that if a trade or business does not constitute “effectively connected income” (ECI) in the hands of a non-resident alien under Section 864(c), then it’s not QBI for a U.S. resident taxpayer operating a domestic trade or business.

Historically, Section 864 applied to nonresident aliens, and foreign entities for determining U.S. source income, including ECI in Section 864(c). Reading Section 864 makes sense with nonresident aliens in mind. However, it gets confusing when 199A overlays language on top of Section 864 for the benefit of determining QBI for U.S. residents.

The function of Section 864 is to show nonresident aliens how to distinguish between U.S.-source income (effectively connected income) vs. foreign-source income. An essential element of Section 199A is to limit a QBI deduction to “domestic trades or businesses,” not foreign ones. 199A also uses the term “qualified trades or business.” It appears the authors of 199A used a modified Section 864 for determining “domestic QBI.”

Section 864 a “trade or business within the U.S.” does not include:
“Section 864(b) — Trade or business within the United States.

Section 864(b)(2) — Trading in securities or commodities.

(A): Stocks and securities.

(i)    In general. Trading in stocks or securities through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian, or other independent agent.

(ii)    Trading for taxpayer’s own account. Trading in stocks or securities for the taxpayer’s own account, whether by the taxpayer or his employees or through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian, or other agent, and whether or not any such employee or agent has discretionary authority to make decisions in effecting the transactions. This clause shall not apply in the case of a dealer in stocks or securities.

(C) Limitation. Subparagraphs (A)(i) and (B)(i) (for commodities) shall apply only if, at no time during the taxable year, the taxpayer has an office or other fixed place of business in the United States through which or by the direction of which the transactions in stocks or securities, or in commodities, as the case may be, are effected.”

Example of (ii) above: A nonresident alien “trades his own account” at a U.S. brokerage firm. The nonresident does not have an office in the U.S., but it doesn’t matter since the 864(b)(2)(C) limitation does not apply to (ii), a trader for his account, it only applies to (i). Although this trader might qualify for TTS, he does not have a “trade or business within the U.S.” and therefore does not have QBI as a nonresident alien.

Notice how Section 199A regs reference Section 864:

“Section 199A(c)(3)(A)(i) provides that for purposes of determining QBI, the term qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss means items of income, gain, deduction and loss to the extent such items are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States (within the meaning of section 864(c), determined by substituting ‘qualified trade or business (within the meaning of section 199A’ for ‘nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation’ or for ‘a foreign corporation’ each place it appears).”

According to tax publisher Checkpoint, “Effectively connected income-qualified business income defined for purposes of the 2018-2025 pass-through deduction.”

“Income derived from excluded services under Code Sec. 864(b)(1) (performance of personal services for foreign employer, or Code Sec. 864(b)(2) (trading in securities or commodities) can never be effectively connected income in the hands of a nonresident alien.

Code Sec. 864(b)(2) generally treats foreign persons, including partnerships, who are trading in stocks, securities, and in commodities for their own account or through a broker or other independent agent as not engaged in a U.S. trade or business. So, if a trade or business isn’t engaged in a U.S. trade or business by reason of Code Sec. 864(b), items of income, gain, deduction, or loss from that trade or business won’t be included in QBI because those items wouldn’t be effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business.”

In 199A, the first reference to Section 864 is under the heading “Interaction of Sections 875(1) and 199A.”

“Section 875(1) Partnerships; beneficiaries of estates and trusts: (i) a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation shall be considered as being engaged in a trade or business within the United States if the partnership of which such individual or corporation is a member is so engaged, and (ii) a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation which is a beneficiary of an estate or trust which is engaged in any trade or business within the United States shall be treated as being engaged in such trade or business within the United States.”

An example of Section 875(1): Consider a U.S. partnership in the consulting business. U.S. residents and nonresident alien investors own it. The Schedule K-1 for partners reports ordinary income on line 1, which according to Section 875(1) is ECI for the nonresident partners. The nonresident alien must file a Form 1040NR to report this ECI, and she might be eligible for a QBI deduction since it’s from a “domestic trade or business,” determined on the entity level.

Conflicts and unresolved questions
Tax writers in 199A regs left conflicts and unresolved questions when it comes to traders in securities and or commodities. Are traders in no man’s land? I’ve asked several of the tax attorneys in IRS Office of Chief Counsel listed in the 199A regs to answer the following question: Are U.S. resident traders in securities and or commodities with trader tax status subject to QBI tax treatment? I am awaiting an answer.

The 199A regs state:

“The trade or business of the performance of services that consist of investing and investment management, trading, or dealing in securities (as defined in section 475(c)(2))…

(xii) Meaning of the provision of services in trading. For purposes of section 199A(d)(2) and paragraph (b)(1)(xi) of this section only, the performance of services that consist of trading means a trade or business of trading in securities (as defined in section 475(c)(2)), commodities (as defined in section 475(e)(2)), or partnership interests. Whether a person is a trader in securities, commodities, or partnership interests is determined by taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances, including the source and type of profit that is associated with engaging in the activity regardless of whether that person trades for the person’s own account, for the account of others, or any combination thereof.”

Section 199A regs define “trading” as a “specified service trade or business” (SSTB). The regs focus on “performance of services,” which relates to a proprietary trader performing trading services to a prop trading firm and issued a 1099-Misc as an independent contractor. Some tax advisors had suggested that hedge funds don’t perform trading services; their management companies do. That may be why tax writers added “trading for your own account.”

The million-dollar question is “Why define TTS trading as an SSTB unless the tax writers intended QBI treatment for that SSTB?

Only a Section 475 election can generate QBI income for a trading SSTB (or QBI losses, if incurred). The 199A final regs added Section 475 to QBI. This combination of SSTB and 475 income would make a trader eligible for a QBI deduction. Others could argue 475 was added only for dealers in securities and or commodities.

The 199A regs indicate if a trade or business does not constitute “effectively connected income” (ECI) in the hands of a nonresident alien under Section 864(c), then it’s not QBI for a U.S. resident taxpayer, even if operating a domestic trade or business. Is there a loophole in that “trader in securities or commodities” are covered under Section 864(b)(2), not 864(c)?

My partner Darren Neuschwander CPA, and I communicated with leading CPAs, including two big-four tax partners. Those tax partners acknowledged conflicts and uncertainties in QBI treatment for hedge funds and solo TTS traders. The vast majority of larger hedge funds don’t elect Section 475, so those hedge funds would only experience the downside to QBI treatment — QBI losses for investors.

The tax attorneys who drafted TCJA and199A regs may have intended to exclude TTS trading companies including hedge funds from QBI tax treatment because they figured these companies would most likely have QBI losses caused by TTS business expenses. They knew QBI excluded most portfolio income like capital gains, dividends, and interest income so that traders might consider the law unfair. I advocated for TTS trades to have QBI treatment because many solo TTS traders have elected Section 475 and they would get a QBI deduction.

TTS and 475 elections help traders
No matter which way the pendulum swings on QBI treatment for traders, I still recommend trader tax status for deducting business expenses, and a TTS S-Corp for health insurance and retirement plan deductions. There are always the tax loss insurance benefits in Section 475. (See Traders Elect Section 475 For Massive Tax Savings.)

Darren L. Neuschwander CPA, and Roger Lorence JD contributed to this blog post.

Hope For Active Crypto Traders With Massive Losses

June 16, 2018 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

The AICPA recently asked the IRS to permit cryptocurrency traders, eligible for trader tax status (TTS), to use a Section 475 MTM election on securities and commodities providing for ordinary gain or loss treatment.

In my March 2018 blog post Cryptocurrencies: Trader Tax Status Benefits And Section 475 Issues, I suggested crypto TTS traders consider filing a protective 2018 Section 475 election on securities and commodities, due by April 17, 2018, in case the IRS allowed it. Many crypto traders had significant losses in early 2018 with the market correction, and with a 475 election, they might avoid the $3,000 capital loss limitation using ordinary loss treatment. I said it hinged on whether the IRS changed its designation of crypto from intangible property to a security or a commodity.

The AICPA letter* implied that the IRS could keep its current classification of crypto as intangible property, yet still permit the use of Section 475.  However, it does raise other questions: The AICPA letter did not distinguish between securities and commodities, whereas, Section 475 does. TTS traders may elect Section 475 on securities only, commodities only, or both, and that has other tax implications.

If the IRS considers crypto a security, then Section 1091 wash-sale loss rules for securities would apply. Wash-sale loss adjustments are a headache and can be costly. (If you buy back a losing trade 30 days before or after, you must defer the wash-sale loss to the replacement position’s cost basis.) As intangible property, crypto is not currently subject to wash-sale losses. A Section 475 election on securities exempts TTS traders from making wash-sale loss adjustments.

If the IRS considers crypto a commodity, then a TTS trader should be able to elect Section 475 on commodities. However, that election has other tax consequences: If you trade Section 1256 contracts, including futures, you will surrender the lower 60/40 capital gains rates on 1256 contracts. For that reason, most traders elect Section 475 on securities only.

AICPA letter excerpt
8. Traders and Dealers of Virtual Currency

“Overview: Taxpayers considered dealers and traders who engage in buying and selling securities in the ordinary course of business to customers may make a ‘mark-to-market’ election under section 475. This election recognizes ordinary gains or losses on the deemed sales involved in the mark-to-market process. The securities holdings on the last day of the year are deemed as sold for their fair market value resulting in both ordinary income and ordinary expenses the same as for any other trade or business. Taxpayers who trade virtual currencies perform this activity on virtual currency exchanges that contain all the robust trading features available on trading platforms for securities and commodities, including the same level of liquidity. In this context, virtual currencies are akin to securities and commodities. This particular issue is also under consideration by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.

Suggested FAQ
Q-22: May taxpayers who trade virtual currency elect the mark-to-market rules under section 475 if they otherwise qualify as a dealer or trader?

A-22: Yes. The nature of virtual currency trading is akin to dealers and traders of securities and commodities and a taxpayer may elect mark-to-market treatment. The taxpayer must otherwise qualify as a dealer or trader in order to make the election.

* The IRS has made no indication that they intend to adopt all, or any, of the many excellent recommendations from the AICPA.

SEC update
On June 14, CNBC reported, “The SEC’s point man on cryptocurrencies and initial coin offerings (ICOs) says that bitcoin and ether are not securities but that many, but not all, ICOs are securities and will come under the regulatory control of the SEC and relevant securities laws.”

The official explained what constitutes a security in the eyes of the SEC. An initial coin offering is likely a security because a third-party company, which is not decentralized ownership, sells an investment product to the public. The sponsor uses the money raised for its internal use. The buyer/investor expects a profit — a return on the investment. Conversely, bitcoin and ether are likely not securities because there was no ICO, ownership is decentralized, and they were not sold as investments.

Trader Tax 101 Video Course

June 11, 2018 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Robert A. Green CPA recorded these videos in June 2018. It’s an excellent primer on trader tax.

There’s another way to watch: On the Interactive Brokers Traders’ Academy page, scroll down to U.S. Trader Tax 101 by GreenTraderTax. There are six lessons, and each comes with Notes and a Quiz. Total course time is approximately 65 minutes. You don’t need an IB account to register.

Djiop_XVAAUfMOV

 

Section 475 MTM

June 10, 2018 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Robert Green explains how traders eligible for trader tax status are entitled to elect Section 475 MTM ordinary gain or loss treatment. This exempts trades from the capital-loss limitation and wash-sale losses, and Section 475 income likely qualifies for the 20% pass-through deduction under the new tax law.

If You Can’t Deduct All Your Trading Losses Consider Section 475 Election

April 6, 2017 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Forbes

If You Can’t Deduct All Your Trading Losses Consider Section 475 Election

Individuals qualifying for trader tax status (TTS) with a significant trading loss in the first quarter of 2017, should consider a 2017 Section 475 MTM election, due by April 18, 2017. (S-Corps and partnerships had to make this election by March 15, 2017.) Profitable traders should consider the election, too.

Avoid loss limitations including a $3,000 capital loss limitation for 2017, capital loss carryovers to 2018, and wash sale loss adjustments. The Section 475 election converts capital losses into unlimited ordinary business losses, which may generate tax savings immediately. For example, a $50,000 Section 475 ordinary loss offsets wage income without limitation, whereas a capital loss is limited to $3,000 against other income, including wages. I refer to Section 475 as “tax loss insurance,” and it’s one of the most attractive tax benefits for TTS traders. April 18th is the deadline, so make the right decision and act fast.

Here are two scenarios where the election is wise

1. TTS individual trader has trading losses of $50,000 for Q1 2017, comprised of $25,000 losses in securities, and $25,000 losses in futures (Section 1256 contracts). He also has a capital loss carryover of $100,000 from 2016 into 2017.

Starting the year 2017, this trader hoped to generate capital gains to use up his capital loss carryover, figuring the next $100,000 of capital gains is tax-free. But, things went awry, and he generated trading losses in 2017.

Smart move: File a 2017 Section 475 MTM election on securities and Section 1256 contracts by April 18, 2017. It doesn’t make sense adding to a significant capital loss carryover. Next, create an LLC trading company, which files a partnership or S-Corp tax return. That entity may generate capital gains to pass through to the individual level to use up the $100,000 capital loss carryover. If the trading entity incurs trading losses, it can elect Section 475 internally, within 75 days of its inception. Plan to revoke the individual Section 475 election on Section 1256 contracts by April 15, 2018, for 2018.

2. TTS sole proprietor trader has trading gains of $40,000 for YTD 2017 in securities and Section 1256 contracts. She does not have a capital loss carryover or unrealized capital losses, so she has a clean slate for electing Section 475. She also trades IRA accounts, so she faces a potential wash sale loss problem. If she incurs a trading loss in her taxable trading account and buys back a substantially identical position 30-days before or after in her IRA account, she will never get the benefit of that tax loss in either taxable or IRA accounts. That’s far worse than a deferred wash sale loss at year end. (Broker 1099Bs don’t account for wash sales between taxable and IRA accounts, whereas the IRS requires taxpayers to do so.)

Smart move: File a 2017 Section 475 MTM election on securities only, not including Section 1256 contracts, by April 18, 2017. She retains lower 60/40 capital gains tax rates on Section 1256 contracts, with 60% being a long-term capital gain taxed at lower rates. The Section 475 election on securities exempts her from wash sale loss adjustments in her taxable accounts, which also prevents wash sale losses with her IRA trading accounts. If she incurs a significant trading loss later in the year in her taxable accounts, she will be glad to have ordinary loss treatment rather than a capital loss limitation.

Section 475 MTM election statement
Type the below statement on a sheet of paper with your name and social security number (or entity EIN) up top.

“Under IRC 475(f), the Taxpayer at this moment elects to adopt the mark-to-market method of accounting for the tax year ended Dec. 31, 2017, and subsequent tax years. The election applies to the following trade or business: Trader in Securities as a sole proprietor (for securities only and not Section 1256 contracts).”

If you want to include Section 1256 contracts, modify the language accordingly. For external Section 475 MTM elections, this is just the first part of the election process – and the most important part. You also have to file a timely 2017 Form 3115 with your 2017 tax return in 2018 (with a duplicate copy to the IRS National Office).

Learn more about Section 475 MTM in Green’s 2017 Trader Tax Guide. There are many nuances, myths, and scenarios to consider.

Section 475 could be an important election for you, so get it right! Don’t be one of the thousands who complain they missed the boat, which sails on April 18th or messes up the process. If you already filed your 2016 tax return or extension, you should send the IRS a letter by April 18, 2017, explaining you left out the election. Consult a trader tax expert, preferably us.

Traders Expo Las Vegas 2016: Trader Tax Law Update

December 1, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Uploaded to YouTube by MoneyShow on Nov 22, 2016

Right before the end of the year, trader tax expert Robert Green will review trader tax status (business expenses), the tax treatment of different financial products including securities, futures, options and ETFs, critical tax elections, wash sale loss limitations, entities with retirement plan deductions, Obamacare taxes, and year-end tax planning.

These Tax Errors Will Cost Professional Traders Dearly

August 15, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

In our 81-minute video, trader tax expert Robert A. Green, CPA explains the below-listed errors and how to avoid them. We provide a timestamp and an orange header for each chapter.

(00:00:00) Opening remarks.
(00:02:03) Mistakenly believing you can rely on securities Form 1099-B.
(00:06:57) Messing up Form 8949 cost-basis reporting.
(00:15:38) Overlooking reporting of rebate income.
(00:18:27) Mishandling trader tax status.
(00:23:25) Errors in preparing Schedule C.
(00:31:23) Not including a note raises a red flag.
(00:36:00) Overlooking or messing up a Section 475 election.
(00:45:09) Messing up Form 4797 and overlooking a Section 481(a) adjustment.
(00:49:44) Commingling Section 475 trades with investment positions.
(00:52:31) Overlooking or messing up capital loss carryovers.
(00:56:35) Overlooking the election to carry back a Section 1256 loss.
(00:58:14) Using the wrong tax treatment on various financial instruments.
(01:01:45) Mishandling foreign transactions.
(01:05:45) Errors with home office deductions.
(01:07:50) Making mistakes on education expenses.
(01:10:16) Paying self-employment tax when not owed.
(01:12:02) Deducting employee benefit plans when not allowed.
(01:13:34) Taking an early withdrawal from an IRA may cost you dearly.
(01:15:38) Overlooking or messing up Obamacare taxes.
(01:18:51) Closing remarks.

Section 481(a) Positive Adjustment Spread Period Changes

May 26, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

According to tax research service Thomson Reuters CheckPoint, “Under the new procedures for filing a Form 3115 for tax year 2015 and forward, the four-year spread period generally applicable to a positive Section 481(a) adjustment has been modified as De minimis § 481(a) adjustment amount increased. Under a de minimis provision, positive adjustment may be spread over one year (versus four years) at the taxpayer’s election. The new procedures increases the de minimis threshold to $50,000 from $25,000. The election is made on the new Form 3115 (Rev 12-2015), Part IV, Line 27.”

This means that a trader with a Section 481(a) income adjustment up to $50,000 can elect to report the entire amount of income in the current tax year rather than spread the income over four years. The IRS is probably hoping fewer taxpayers defer income and some may forget to report that income in subsequent tax years. 

According to Green’s 2016 Trader Tax Guide, “Form 3115 (Change in Accounting Method) includes a section for reporting a Section 481(a) adjustment, which is required when a change of accounting is made. The rest of the multi-page Form 3115 relates to tax law and code sections, etc. In the case of changing to Section 475 MTM, a trader’s section 481(a) adjustment is his unrealized business trading gain or loss as of Dec. 31 of the prior tax year. A section 481(a) loss is deductible in full; whereas a gain of more than $25,000 must be prorated over four tax years.” Effective for 2015 tax filings, the $25,000 is changed to $50,000. 

For example: If a trader’s 2015 Section 481(a) adjustment is $40,000, on their 2015 Form 3115 they may elect to report the full income. Conversely, if the income adjustment is $60,000 they would have to spread it over four years reporting $15,000 each year.

Section 475 and Section 481(a) adjustments
When a trader with trader tax status (TTS) elects Section 475 mark-to-market (MTM) ordinary gain or loss treatment, the IRS requires a Section 481(a) adjustment on income tax Form 3115 (Application for Change in Accounting Method) and Form 4797 (Sales of Business Property).

The trader is changing accounting method from the cash method on Dec. 31 to the Section 475 MTM method on Jan. 1. If the trader has open TTS securities positions on Dec. 31 the Section 481(a) adjustment is the unrealized gain or loss on TTS positions on Dec. 31. Gain is a positive adjustment and loss is a negative adjustment. Segregated investment positions in securities are not included in the Section 481(a) adjustment. Section 1256 contracts like futures are already subject to MTM so they also are not included in the 481(a) adjustment.

 

IRS Considering “Freeze And Mark” For Section 475 Election

May 10, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Click to read Green's blog post in Forbes.

Click to read Green’s blog post in Forbes.

According to Tax Notes article “IRS Considering ‘Freeze and Mark’ for Trader Election” dated Jan. 20, 2016, Robert Williams, branch 3 senior counsel, IRS Office of Associate Chief Counsel (Financial Institutions and Products), said he was optimistic, though cautious, that updated Section 475 regulations will come out by June 30, 2016.

The Tax Notes article mentioned a few significant potential changes that would affect traders in making a new Section 475 election. If codified by the IRS, I expect these changes won’t apply retroactively, so traders who made a 2016 Section 475 election by April 18 should not be affected.

Clarification of the character of income or loss of a Section 481(a) adjustment: The IRS may clarify that it’s a capital gain or loss, rather than an ordinary income or loss, which is the current interpretation. Many traders have benefited from ordinary loss treatment, especially when a Section 481(a) adjustment included wash sale loss deferrals on open trading business positions.

No election deadline: The changes may allow existing taxpayers to make a new Section 475 election throughout the tax year. Currently,  the election deadline is April 15 for existing partnerships and individuals and March 15 for S-Corps. Many existing taxpayers will appreciate doing away with the deadline.

No retroactive application: Williams discussed applying ordinary income or loss treatment on the election date and going forward, and doing away with retroactive application of ordinary income or loss to Jan. 1.

Under current law, when a trader elected Section 475 by April 18, 2016 for 2016 (normally April 15), the election was retroactive to Jan. 1, 2016, so all 2016 trading gains and losses are ordinary income and loss. If a trader qualified for trader tax status (TTS) at year-end 2015, he also makes a Section 481(a) adjustment on Jan. 1, 2016 for unrealized gains or losses on open trading positions on Dec. 31, 2015.

Traders have been able to use hindsight between Jan. 1 and April 15 to make a last-minute decision about electing Section 475. For example, if they have a large trading loss in Q1, they may elect Section 475 to lock in ordinary loss treatment for that loss, and plan to revoke Section 475 in the subsequent year to get back to capital gains treatment to use up capital loss carryovers. That type of hindsight may be lost with these potential updates in the law.