Tag Archives: entities

How To Avoid IRS Challenge On Your Family Office

June 28, 2018 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

Investors may no longer deduct investment expenses, including those passed through from an investment partnership. Restructuring these expenses into a management company might achieve business expense treatment providing it’s a genuine family office with substantial staff rendering financial services to extended family members and outside clients.

The IRS might assert the family office is managing “one’s own investments,” not for outside clients, so the management company is also an investment company with non-deductible investment expenses. Before you go in that direction, it’s wise to learn the lessons of the Lender Management court case from December 2017, which is one of the first on family offices.

Size matters
A single-family office serves one ultra-wealthy extended family, whereas, a multi-family office handles more than one family. Well-established single- and multi-family offices offer a wide variety of financial services, including wealth management, financial planning, accounting, tax, and personal finance. They have substantial staff and salaries, offices, equipment, and operations — the markings of an independent financial services company.

Family office requirements
A family office management company with underlying investment partnerships can use business expense treatment when it has the following characteristics, borne out of the Lender Management tax court case and earlier case law:

- It’s a functional financial services company with significant staff and salaries, an office, equipment and bona fide operations.
- It operates in a continuous and business-like manner.
- Its staff has expertise that is valuable to its clients.
- A profit-allocation of capital gains is considered advisory fee compensation for services rendered. It gets paid more than just its share of profits based on capital.
- It should be profitable.
- It caters to many extended family members with diverging financial needs. It does not operate with a single mindset but provides customized services to each family member.
- Family members and their investment partnerships are not obligated to use the family office.
- There should not be a majority of common ownership between the management company and investment partnerships (this factor is critical).
- It’s safer to have third-party clients who are not family members (a suggestion, not a requirement).

Small family offices have trouble
If two spouses own an investment partnership and management company, then the family office has 100% common ownership, which fails the requirements. The micro family office renders services exclusively to the spousal-owned investment partnership. The management company does not function as an independent financial services company, with outside staff or an outside office. It does not stand alone as a financial service provider. In the eyes of the IRS, it oversees its own investments. This management company should not use business expense treatment. (Some trader accounting and law firms sold this scheme to traders who do not qualify for trader tax status. I’ve always said it did not work and the Lender court confirms it doesn’t work.)

Management fees and carried interest
Consider this typical example: An investment partnership pays a 0.5% management fee on funds under management of $1M ($5,000 per year). The investment partnership also pays a 20% profit allocation (carried interest) based on performance (say, $50,000 for the year). The investment partnership passes through an investment expense of $5,000 for the management fee, which the investor cannot deduct on their tax return. The profit allocation avoids the investment expense deduction problem because it carves out a share of capital gains on each investor’s Schedule K-1.

The management company reports $5,000 of revenue for the management fee, which gives the impression of being a trade or business. However, that’s not enough revenue to cover expenses, so it lacks presumption of business purpose. The management company also reports capital gains income of $50,000 from the profit allocation of investment income. Total income is $55,000 minus business expenses of $52,000 equals a net income of $3,000. The capital gains help satisfy the presumption of business purpose test. The owner sacrificed the $5,000 deduction in the investment partnership to arrange $52,000 of deductions in the management company. However, the IRS might disallow the entire $52,000 deduction, asserting the management company is also an investment company with non-deductible investment expenses because it did not satisfy the requirements for a family office under the Lender court.

Hedge funds
Assume a hedge fund manager owns the management company, which deducts business expenses. The hedge fund partnership does not qualify for trader tax status, so it’s an investment partnership. Most hedge funds meet this scenario. The management company is genuine, and there is little common ownership because the hedge fund is predominately owned by outside investors. That satisfies the Lender court requirements for a management company.

It might be different for a startup hedge fund before outside investors become limited partners in the limited partnership. Until and unless that happens, the manager is managing his own investments, and it fails Lender. The limited partnership is probably not paying the management company advisory fees including profit allocation in connection with the managers capital.

Lender Management tax court case
In Lender Management v. Comm. (Dec. 16, 2017), the tax court overruled the IRS by awarding business expense treatment to Lender Management. It was a well-established single-family office servicing many family-owned investment partnerships. Lender provided customized investment and management services throughout the year to many different family members, with varying needs, across an extensive family tree. Lender Management and the investment partnerships did not have too much common ownership according to IRS and tax court calculations. Only a few of Lender’s dozens of family members owned the management company.

The IRS was unable to cite attribution rules that should apply to Lender. The Lender case also dealt with how to handle revocable vs. irrevocable trusts in the overlap test for common ownership. The Lender court did not define how much overlap ownership is permitted.

Other tax court cases
In Higgins v. Comm. (1941), the tax court said, “No matter how large the estate or how continuous or extended the work may be, overseeing the management of one’s own investments is generally regarded the work of an investor.”

In Dagres v. Comm. (2011), “Selling one’s investment expertise to others is as much an expertise as selling legal expertise, or medical expertise.”

Trade or business partnerships
In Higgins, replace the words “business” for “investment” and the outcome is favorable: “Overseeing the management of one’s own businesses is generally regarded as the work of a business.” If there is a trading partnership with trader tax status, or a rental real estate partnership with ordinary income, then the management company can look through to the business treatment.

A C-Corp management company
Some families and tax advisors are considering a C-Corp management company to take advantage of the new tax law’s 21% flat rate.

Be sure the management company meets the Lender court requirements for a family office. Otherwise, the IRS does not permit a C-Corp investment company to deduct investment expenses. Section 212 (investment expenses) applies to non-corporate taxpayers, not corporations. A C-Corp with a trade or business is entitled to deduct business expenses in connection with making ancillary investments, like investing treasury capital.

When taking into account the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, don’t focus solely on the federal 21% flat tax rate on the C-Corp level. There are plenty of other taxes, including capital gains taxes on qualified dividends, corporate taxes in 44 states, and IRS 20% accumulated earnings tax assessed on excess retained earnings, which is any amount above zero for an investment company. (See How To Decide If A C-Corp Is Right For Your Trading Business.)

Apportionment between investment and business partnerships
Family offices might want to consider having more of their underlying investment partnerships achieve business treatment, like trader tax status or rental real estate income. If a family office does not satisfy the requirements, and it services investment partnerships and business partnerships, it might consider using hybrid reporting to apportion business expenses vs. investment expenses.

Wealthy families diversify their interests and invest in family-owned investment partnerships in securities and commodities, outside hedge funds, private equity funds, venture capital funds, and real estate partnerships and REITs. Consult a tax advisor to learn more about which underlying investment partnerships have investment expense treatment vs. trade or business activities.

Darren Neuschwander, CPA, and Roger Lorence, Esq., contributed to this post.

Still Time For Trading Entities To Make Valuable Year-End Tax Moves

November 30, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Forbes published this post.

If you conduct a trading business in an S-Corp and plan on employee benefit plan deductions for 2016, you need to execute certain transactions at year-end. If you have a partnership, there are fewer steps to take.

S-Corp year-end planning for traders

Before the end of the year:

  • Execute and pay officer compensation. Determine compensation based on the retirement plan contribution you want. (You should limit retirement plan contributions to net profits, and not fund plans if you have net losses in the S-Corp. You need this officer compensation to create earned income to have employee benefit plan deductions.)
  • Establish a Solo 401(k) or defined benefit plan (DBP) before year-end. Contribute up to $59,000 in a Solo 401(k) and perhaps up to $200,000 or more with a DBP if you are 45 or older.
  • “Use or lose” an S-Corp accountable plan before year end for reimbursing business expenses paid individually, including home office expenses.

In January 2017:

  • Fund the Solo 401(k) “elective deferral” contribution: Up to $18,000, plus an additional $6,000 catch-up provision, if age 50 or older. Deduct the elective deferral from taxable wages on the W-2. The elective deferral is subject to payroll taxes.
  • For an S-Corp: Add officer health insurance premiums to the officer’s W-2 taxable wages. The amount is exempt from payroll taxes, including FICA, Medicare and state workmen’s compensation. The S-Corp owner/officer should simultaneously take an AGI deduction for health insurance on his or her individual tax return. (Officer health insurance is quirky with an S-Corp).
  • Prepare and e-file W-2s by Jan. 31 (new deadline this year).
  • Prepare and e-file Form 1099-Misc for “non-employee compensation” paid to service providers, including independent contractors, by Jan. 31 (new deadline this year).

For payroll, we recommend a team at www.Paychex.com dedicated to the needs of our trader tax clients using S-Corps. Please contact us for their contact and related information.

To avoid under-estimated tax penalties caused by skipping quarterly estimated tax payments earlier in the year on the individual level, consider increasing tax withholding on officer compensation. The IRS treats payroll tax withholding as being made throughout the year, so that should lower under-estimated tax penalties if you generated most of your trading gains earlier in the year.

The S-Corp needs to qualify for trader tax status (TTS) for the IRS to allow it to have compensation and employee benefit plan deductions, including health insurance and retirement plans. The IRS does not permit an investment company to have these employee benefit plan deductions.

The IRS requires partnerships to treat compensation paid to partners as “guaranteed payments,” and it does not allow partners to have salary run through payroll. But, a trading partnership should not use guaranteed payments since the IRS views it as an investment company. A partnership may pay an administration fee to the owner/trader, but with partnership losses caused by these fees flowing through to the partner, it’s difficult for them to generate self-employment income (SEI). A partner needs SEI to have AGI-deductions for health insurance and a retirement plan. S-Corp losses do not flow through to the owner for SEI purposes, and that’s the reason I recommend the S-Corp structure for traders who want employee benefit plan deductions.

If you have a dual entity structure with trading partnership and S-Corp or C-Corp management company, you should be adhering to written agreements providing for administration fees and or profit allocation. The agreements must represent valid business relationships, operations and work performed.

To learn more, watch our complimentary recording: Year-End Planning For Entities: Payroll, Retirement and Health Insurance. The accompanying worksheet (on the recording page) highlights the differences in a Solo 401(k) vs. a defined benefit plan and tax savings at different levels of income. This content is dated Nov. 12, 2015, and it’s still useful for 2016 year-end tax planning as there are few tax changes from 2015. I expect changes in entity tax strategies with tax reform and tax cuts in 2017, so stay tuned for blog post updates. (Read Traders Likely To Benefit If Senate Rams Through Trump Tax Cuts.)

I suggest our entity clients contact their assigned CPA immediately to get started on valuable tax planning, including executing the above transactions on a timely basis. (Read Many Ways Traders Can Save Taxes Before Year-End. Please don’t wait until late December as we take time off for the holidays.

My partners Darren Neuschwander, CPA and Adam Manning, CPA contributed to this blog post.

A Few States Tax S-Corps: Traders Can Reduce It

July 6, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Click to read Green's blog post in Forbes.

Click to read Green’s blog post in Forbes.

Traders qualifying for trader tax status need an S-Corp structure if they want tax-advantaged employee benefit plans, including health insurance and retirement, saving thousands in taxes. Conversely, if they use a partnership or sole proprietor structure, traders cannot have employee benefit plan deductions.

An S-Corp is tax-free on the entity level for federal tax purposes, and most states have small minimum taxes on S-Corps. However, a few jurisdictions have higher taxes: On S-Corp net income, Illinois has a 1.5% Replacement Tax, California a 1.5% Franchise Tax, and New York City an 8.85% General Corporate Tax. In those jurisdictions, I recommend a dual entity structure for high-income traders: A trading general partnership, which is free of state or NYC taxes, and an S-Corp management company with a low income and little state or NYC taxes.

Illinois Replacement Tax
S-Corps and partnerships operating in Illinois are liable for IL replacement tax of 1.5% on net income. There’s an important exception applicable to traders:  an “investment partnership” is exempt from IL replacement tax. An investment partnership doesn’t have to file an IL Form 1065 partnership tax return. (See Illinois Income Tax Act Section 1501(a)(11.5)).

The investment partnership exception does not apply to an S-Corp. If the trading company files an S-Corp Form 1120-S federal tax return, it must also file an IL Form 1120-ST (Small Business Corporation Replacement Tax Return) and pay the replacement tax.

California Franchise Tax
S-Corps operating in California are liable for CA franchise tax of 1.5% on net income. The minimum franchise tax is $800 per year, even in a short year. $800 divided by 1.5% equals $53,333. That means an S-Corp owes franchise tax above the $800 minimum tax after net income exceeds $53,333. Deduct officer compensation and employee benefit plans in calculating net income. General partnerships are not liable for an $800 minimum tax, but LLCs are. Only the S-Corp owes 1.5% franchise tax.

New York City General Corporation Tax
You can have an S-Corp for federal and New York State tax purposes, but New York City will disregard your S-Corp tax status and treat it as a C-Corp, a regular corporation. That means New York City will expect your S-Corp to pay General Corporation Tax (GCT) of 8.85% on net income. Reduce net income with deductions for officer compensation and employee benefit plans. If your income is high, you may trigger some “alternative tax,” which requires adding back officer compensation with an alternative tax calculation.

Strategies to limit state taxation
If you have trading gains not exceeding $200,000 per year in Illinois, California, or New York City, it’s okay to use an S-Corp, providing you plan to maximize retirement plan contributions using a Solo 401(k). From the $200,000 trading gains in the S-Corp, deduct the maximum $140,000 of officer compensation needed to unlock the maximum Solo 401(k) plan contribution limit of $53,000, or $59,000 with the over-age 50 catch-up provision. Net income will be low, thereby limiting state or NYC taxes.

If you consistently have trading gains over $300,000 per year in Illinois, California, and New York City, consider a dual entity structure: A trading general partnership, which is free of state or NYC taxes, and an S-Corp management company with a low income and little state or NYC taxes.

The trading company pays the management company monthly administration fees, and a “profit allocation,” which is a share of trading gains. With this income, the management company pays officer compensation and employee benefit plans. The goal is for the management company to have a minor net income to reduce state or NYC taxes. With proper tax planning, tax savings from the dual-entity solution should well exceed tax compliance costs for the two entities.

State and city taxation varies, so consult with a trader tax advisor.

Read my upcoming five-part blog series and attend our Webinar: Tax Battle Of The States.

Darren Neuschwander CPA contributed to this blog post.

Entity & Benefit Plan Tax-Advantaged Solutions 2016

May 18, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

In this 46-minute recording, entity tax expert Robert A. Green CPA explains how traders who qualify for trader tax status (TTS) can unlock health insurance and retirement plan deductions using an S-Corp trading company or C-Corp management company. Learn the best entities and retirement plans for traders and how to maximize use of tax elections like Section 475 MTM. Published May 17, 2016.

Safeguard Use Of Section 475 By Trading In An Entity

May 10, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Section 475 “tax loss insurance” is a fantastic tax benefit for active securities traders qualifying for trader tax status (TTS). Many individual taxpayers have been using it successfully for years. I’ve exhorted the benefits since 1997, when Congress enacted Section 475 tax law for traders.

Some Section 475 provisions are vague
Increasingly, my firm’s tax compliance CPAs have noticed problems with the nuances of Section 475, including some of the rule sections, which are too vague. The IRS acknowledged this with its “Section 475 Clean Up Project” and read our comment letter to the IRS. The IRS said the project is being completed and to expect updated Section 475 regulations in the summer of 2016. (I cover the changes being discussed at tax attorney conferences in my next blog post IRS Considering “Freeze and Mark” for Section 475 Election.)

One of the problems with Section 475 regulations has to do with segregation of investments. Segregation should be done in form and substance and that can be confusing. A prior IRS proposed regulation called for designation of investment accounts, but that was not sufficient as traders could use substance to trump form.

This problem arises when a trader uses Section 475 and also holds investment positions in substantially identical positions. Traders can’t elect Section 475 by account. The law makes the election by taxpayer identification number, which means the election applies to all active trading accounts and investment accounts containing active trading.

Traders can solve this problem by housing the trading business using Section 475 in a separate legal entity and holding investments in individual accounts. This is the only way to fully segregate investments from trading. (Read my recent blog post Active Traders Should Consider An Entity For Tax Savings for other reasons to form an entity.)

Misidentified investment positions
Many individuals trade substantially identical positions between Section 475 active trading accounts and taxable investment accounts, including joint and spousal accounts. For example, they trade Apple options in a Section 475 account and also hold Apple equity in segregated investment accounts.

The IRS can view this trading as gaming the system, with the trader deducting ordinary losses on Apple options but deferring taxes on unrealized long-term capital gains in Apple equity held as an investment. Because Apple options and Apple equity are substantially identical positions, the IRS has the power in Section 475 regulations to treat either the Apple options or the Apple equity as “misidentified investment positions,” which means it can apply Section 475(d)(2). (Learn more about that Section 475 penalty in my blog post IRS Plays Havoc with Traders Misidentifying Investments.)

Experienced trader tax preparers and IRS agents may seek other ways to address this problem, including reclassifying Section 475 ordinary losses on Apple options as investment capital losses, which then triggers capital loss limitations and wash sale loss adjustments on substantially identical positions across all accounts. Or if it’s better for the IRS position, reclassifying Apple equity investments as Section 475 trades, triggering Section 475 MTM ordinary income treatment, thereby losing tax deferral and missing out on lower long-term capital gains rates on realization.

An entity solves the problem
Traders can avoid this problem by ring-fencing Section 475 trades in separate entity accounts and holding investments in individual accounts. A separate legal entity has a different taxpayer identification number vs. an individual taxpayer social security number.

Don’t transfer investment positions into the entity, as that brings the same problem to the entity-level: having trading and investment accounts and or positions on the same taxpayer identification number.

I suggest that traders using portfolio margining on investment positions make the following decision. Either bring investments into the trading entity for portfolio margining and don’t elect Section 475 in the entity or leave the investments out of the entity and elect Section 475.

A newly formed entity may elect Section 475 by placing a resolution in its own books and records within 75 days of inception. Existing taxpayers must elect Section 475 by making an election statement with the IRS by the due date of the prior year tax return, and later file a timely Form 3115 for the year of the election. (Read my blog post Traders: Consider Ordinary Loss Election By Tax Deadline for more details on making the election.)

IRS scrutinizes individuals with large Section 475-related NOL tax refunds
It’s been over a decade since Chen vs. Commission (2004), but an IRS official recently reiterated the importance of that landmark tax court case, deeming similar cases “Chen cases.”

The IRS official was referring to sole proprietor (individual) traders reporting large Schedule C and Form 4797 (Section 475) ordinary losses on individual tax returns and filing for large NOL carryback refunds claims with the IRS. All the cases in my Green’s 2016 Trader Tax Guide, including Assaderaghi, Nelson, Endicott and Holsinger are similar: individuals with Schedule C and Form 4797 losses.

It’s much better to file as an entity trader with Section 475 ordinary loss treatment. The tax refund is the same, but you substantially reduce your chances of IRS exam and denial of TTS, which is required for use of Section 475.

Section 475 tax benefits
Securities traders qualifying for TTS benefit from a Section 475 election. Section 475 securities trades are exempt from wash sale loss adjustments and a capital loss limitation. Section 475 has business ordinary loss treatment, which offsets income of any kind and contributes to net operating losses (NOLs), which may be carried back two years and/or forward 20 years. Short-term capital gains and Section 475 MTM gains are taxed at the ordinary tax rate, so Section 475 is recommended for securities traders.

Conversely, Section 1256 contract traders (futures and more) generally don’t want Section 475 since they would lose lower 60/40 capital gains tax rates in Section 1256 (60% is a long-term capital gain taxed at lower rates and 40% is a short-term capital gain).

Traders can elect Section 475 on securities only, retaining Section 1256 treatment on futures. Section 475 does not apply to segregated investments. Traders value ordinary loss treatment: It’s free tax loss insurance for securities traders.

I’ve been advising traders on tax matters for over 30 years and I’ve seen many ups and downs in the financial markets. I’ve seen professional traders with wide fluctuations of income and loss, too. It’s important to avoid the dreaded $3,000 capital loss limitation against other income and benefit from Section 475 ordinary business loss treatment to generate immediate tax refund relief.

 

 

Active Traders Should Consider An Entity For Tax Savings

May 3, 2016 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Click to read Green's blog post in Forbes.

Click to read Green’s blog post in Forbes.

Forming an entity can save active investors and business traders significant taxes. Active investors can limit wash sale losses calculated between their individual taxable investment accounts and IRAs with an entity account. Business traders solidify trader tax status (TTS), unlock employee-benefit deductions, gain flexibility with a Section 475 election and revocation and limit wash-sale losses with individual and IRA accounts. For many active traders, an entity solution generates tax savings in excess of entity formation and compliance costs.

An entity return consolidates your trading activity on a pass-through tax return (partnership Form 1065 or S-Corp 1120-S), making life easier for you, your accountant and the IRS. It’s important to segregate investments from business trading when claiming TTS, and an entity is most useful in that regard. It’s simple and inexpensive to set up and operate.

Additionally, entities help traders elect Section 475 MTM (ordinary-loss treatment) later in the tax year — within 75 days of inception — if they missed the individual MTM election deadline on April 15. And it’s easier for an entity to exit TTS and revoke Section 475 MTM than it is for a sole proprietor. It’s more convenient for a new entity to adopt Section 475 MTM internally from inception, as opposed to an existing taxpayer whom must file a Form 3115 after filing an external election with the IRS.

Don’t worry, prior capital loss carryovers on the individual level are not lost; they still carry over on your individual Schedule D. The new entity can pass through capital gains if you skip the Section 475 MTM election to use up those capital loss carryovers. After using up capital loss carryovers, your entity can elect Section 475 MTM in a subsequent tax year.

Business traders often use an S-Corp trading company or an S-Corp or C-Corp management company to pay salary to the owner in connection with a retirement plan contribution, which otherwise isn’t possible in a partnership trading company (unless a trader has other sources of earned income or is a dealer member of a futures or options exchange).

Trading in an entity can help constitute a performance record for traders looking to launch an investment-management business. Finally, many types of entities are useful for asset protection and business continuity. A separate legal entity gives the presumption of business purpose, but a trader entity still must achieve TTS.

Avoid wash sales with an entity
Active investors in securities are significantly impacted by permanent and deferred wash sale losses between IRA and individual taxable accounts.

Trading in an entity helps avoid these problems. The entity is separate from your individual and IRA accounts for purposes of wash sales since the entity is a different taxpayer. An individual calculates wash sales among all their accounts. Ring fencing active trading into an entity account separates those trades from the individual wash sale loss calculations. The IRS is entitled to apply related party transaction rules (Section 267) if the entity purposely tries to avoid wash sales with the owner’s individual accounts. In that case, the entity will not avoid wash sale loss treatment.

If you don’t purposely avoid wash sales, you can break the chain on year-to-date wash sales in taxable individual accounts by switching over to an entity account mid-year or at year-end, and prevent further permanent wash-sale losses with IRAs. If the entity qualifies for TTS, it can consider a Section 475 MTM election exempting it from wash sales (on business positions, not investment positions); that also negates related party rules.

Play it safe on related party transaction rules by avoiding the repurchase of substantially identical positions in the new entity after taking a loss in the individual accounts.

Business traders: consider an entity
Many active traders ramp up into qualification for TTS. They wind up filing an individual Schedule C (Profit or Loss from Business) as a sole proprietor business trader the first year. That’s fine. They deduct trading business expenses on Schedule C and report trading gains and losses on other tax forms. They can even elect Section 475 MTM by April 15 of a given tax year to use ordinary gain or loss treatment (recommended on securities only). But a Schedule C owner may not pay himself compensation and the Schedule C does not generate self-employment income, either of which is required to deduct health insurance premiums and retirement plan contributions from gross income. (The exception is a full-fledged dealer/member of an options or futures exchange trading Section 1256 contracts on that exchange; they have SEI per Section 1402i.) The business trader needs an entity for those employee-benefit plan deductions.

Safeguard use of Section 475

Pass-through entities
We recommend pass-through entities for traders. A pass-through entity means the entity is a tax filer, but it’s not a taxpayer. The owners are the taxpayers, most often on their individual tax returns. Consider marriage, state residence and state tax rules including minimum taxes, franchise taxes and more when setting up your entity. Report all entity trading gains, losses and expenses on the entity tax return and issue a Schedule K-1 to each owner for their respective share — on which income retains its character. For example, the entity can pass through capital gains to utilize individual capital loss carryovers. Or the entity can pass through Section 475 MTM ordinary losses to comprise an individual net operating loss (NOL) carryback for immediate refund.

The best types of entities
We like the S-Corp because it pays compensation (officer’s salary) to the owner, which efficiently unlocks health insurance premium and retirement plan contribution deductions. You can form a single-member LLC or multi-member (spousal) LLC and the LLC can elect S-Corp tax treatment within 75 days of inception or by March 15 of the following tax year. (Another option is to form a corporation and it can elect S-Corp tax treatment, too.) A general partnership can also elect S-Corp status in every state except Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Michigan, New Hampshire, New Jersey and Tennessee.

But the S-Corp is not feasible alone in some states or cities, including California and New York City. In those places, we suggest a trading company partnership return — either a general partnership or LLC — and a management company S-Corp or C-Corp. You can convey interests in the pass-through entity to family revocable trusts or even irrevocable trusts. (See our blog post Business Traders Maximize Tax benefits with an S-Corp.)

Year-end Entity planning
There are important tax matters to execute with entities before year-end. For example, S-corps and C-corps should execute payroll before year-end. A Solo 401(k) defined contribution plan or defined benefit retirement plan must be established before year-end. (Watch our Webinar recording: Year-End Planning For Entities: Payroll, Retirement and Health Insurance.)

This is an excerpt from Green’s 2016 Trader Tax Guide.

Webinar 5/17:  Entity & Benefit Plan Tax-Advantaged Solutions 2016. We plan to offer a recording afterwards. 

 

 

Entity & Benefits Plan Tax-Advantaged Solutions 2016 (Recording)

| By: Robert A. Green, CPA

Description:

Join entity tax expert Robert A. Green CPA as he explains the following:

- Employee-benefit plan deductions: Traders who qualify for trader tax status (TTS) unlock health insurance and retirement plan deductions using an S-Corp trading company or C-Corp management company. Individual retail traders don’t have self-employment income so they cannot have employee-benefit plan deductions. See examples of saving $7,000 to over $16,000 in taxes.

- Tax loss insurance: Traders in securities with TTS benefit from a Section 475 election: It exempts them from wash sale loss adjustments and a capital loss limitation. It’s better to ring-fence Section 475 trades within an entity, segregating them from investments in individual taxable and IRA accounts. New entities may elect Section 475 within 75 days of inception.

- Best entities: Learn the best choice of entity for different situations. An S-Corp is best for maximizing employee-benefit deductions; otherwise, a partnership tax return works well. A C-Corp is inappropriate as a trading vehicle, but okay as a management company. In some cases, having a trading company and a management company is helpful.

- Best retirement plans: Learn the basics on Solo 401(k) defined contribution plans and more powerful defined benefit plans.

- Timing: Mid-year is an excellent time to form a trading entity. It breaks the chain on wash sales in your individual taxable accounts and there’s plenty of time to maximize employee-benefit plan deductions for the entire year.

Our live event is complimentary and we plan to offer a complimentary recording.

Related blog posts:
Active Traders Should Consider An Entity For Tax Savings
Safeguard Use Of Section 475 By Trading In An Entity

S-Corps: Use Accountable Plan Before Year-End

December 16, 2015 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA

One formality of using an S-Corp is that it should have an accountable plan for reimbursing employee expenses, including the employee’s home-office deduction. Without an accountable plan, employees report unreimbursed employee business expenses on Form 2106, which is part of miscellaneous itemized deductions only deductible in excess of 2% of AGI and not deductible for AMT. With proper usage of an accountable plan, the S-Corp reports the deductions on its tax return.

Expense reporting is more relaxed with partnership tax structures. Partners may report unreimbursed partnership expenses (UPE) on their individual tax return Schedule E, including home office deductions from Form 8829. S-corporation shareholders generally cannot deduct unreimbursed business expenses on Schedule E because the shareholders are categorized as employees when performing services for the corporation.

If you don’t have an accountable plan, draft one as soon as possible and use it before year-end. For home office deductions, reference Form 8829 as a guide for the S-Corp for reimbursement.

Click here for a sample accountable plan.

Learn more about accountable plans on our recommended payroll service provider’s Website at http://www.paychex.com/articles/finance/using-accountable-plans-benefits-both-employers-and-employees.

If you need help with an accountable plan, email us at info@gnmtradertax.com or contact your assigned CPA in our firm.