Category: 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA)

2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act and related IRS regulations

OBBBA Trader Tax Update: 2025 Law Secures Key Provisions for Traders

July 9, 2025 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), passed in July 2025, delivers lasting clarity for traders and small business owners by locking in and expanding many tax reforms from the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). OBBBA makes permanent or extends favorable provisions that benefit traders eligible for trader tax status (TTS) and Section 475 mark-to-market (MTM) accounting.

Unless otherwise noted, all tax law changes and provisions discussed below are effective beginning in 2025.


TTS Rules and Section 475 MTM Unchanged

TTS qualifications and Section 475(f) election rules remain intact. The final OBBBA does not reference or alter Section 475(f), meaning the existing Section 475 mark‑to‑market election for traders remains unchanged under current law. In legislative drafting, if no changes are enacted, existing provisions continue to apply.

TTS traders benefit from the tax treatment of business expenses. (See Trader Tax Status: How To Qualify.) With a timely filed Section 475 election, TTS traders receive ordinary loss treatment, which avoids the $3,000 capital loss limitation and exempts them from wash sale loss adjustments on securities. Profitable TTS traders can treat Section 475 ordinary income as qualified business income (QBI), making it eligible for the 20% QBI deduction. TTS is claimed by assessment; no formal election is required. However, an election is necessary for Section 475 MTM accounting. Investors are not eligible for Section 475—only TTS traders can use it.

Section 475 election deadlines for 2025:

  • Individuals – April 15, 2025

  • Pass-through entities – March 15, 2025

If a deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, it is extended to the next business day, by IRS rules.

If you missed the 2025 deadline, consider applying for 2026 instead. Attach the 475 election to the prior year’s tax filing, either the full tax return or extension. A 2025 Form 3115 must be filed with the 2025 tax return in 2026 as the second step of the election process. New entities can elect Section 475 within 75 days of formation, and this internal election does not require Form 3115.


Excess Business Losses Now Permanent

The excess business loss limitation (EBL) under Section 461(l) is now permanent. For 2025, thresholds are $313,000 (single) and $626,000 (married), indexed for inflation. EBL affects TTS traders who deduct business expenses on Schedule C, elect and use Section 475 ordinary losses for trading, or receive pass-through ordinary losses. Excess business losses convert into net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, which can offset income of any kind. This permanence rejects earlier proposals that sought to limit such offsets.


Net Operating Loss (NOL) Rules Remain Unchanged

NOL rules remain unchanged under OBBBA. TCJA NOLs continue to carry forward indefinitely and are capped at 80% of taxable income. No carrybacks are allowed after 2017, except under the CARES Act, which enables NOLs arising in 2018, 2019, or 2020 to be carried back up to five years. TTS traders using Section 475 have ordinary losses and business expenses that comprise NOLs.


Qualified Business Income (QBI) Deduction Made Permanent

The 20% QBI deduction under Section 199A is now permanent under OBBBA. QBI applies to TTS traders with Section 475 ordinary income, with pass-through entities or sole proprietorships. QBI excludes capital gains, interest, dividends, and foreign exchange transactions.

For 2025, the TCJA income threshold is $394,600 (married) and $197,300 (single), which is indexed for inflation. There is also a non-indexed phase-in, phase-out range of $100,000 (married) and $50,000 (single), subject to wages and property limitations. For 2026, the income threshold will be indexed for inflation. Additionally, OBBBA increases the 2026 phase-in, phase-out range to $150,000 (married) and $75,000 (single), which will be indexed for inflation from 2026. Beginning in 2026, OBBBA also introduces a minimum QBI deduction of $400 (indexed for inflation) for taxpayers with at least $1,000 of qualified business income.

For TTS traders, an S-Corp can utilize the phase-in, phase-out because it is subject to a wage limitation. Only TTS S-Corps pay wages to their owners, whereas partnerships and sole proprietor Schedule Cs cannot pay salaries to their owners.


Bonus Depreciation Fully Restored

100% bonus depreciation is permanently reinstated for qualifying assets placed in service after January 19, 2025. Eligible property includes most new or used tangible business assets with a recovery period of 20 years or less, such as computers, office equipment, furniture, and off-the-shelf software. These assets must be used predominantly for business purposes. Real estate and intangible assets, such as goodwill, are excluded.

For traders, this provision may apply to technology infrastructure used in trading businesses, including multiple monitors, trading computers, and certain types of licensed software.


Section 174A – Internal-Use Software Expensing

Domestic research and experimental (R&E) expenses are fully deductible in the year incurred, including costs for internal-use software. Foreign-developed software must be amortized over a 15-year period.

TTS traders building custom automated trading systems (ATS) benefit, but off-the-shelf ATS without significant customization by the trader may not. TTS requires trader involvement in the trades and self-creation of the ATS system; otherwise, the trader is classified as an investor, and TCJA denies investment expense itemized deductions.


Section 179 Expensing Expanded

The Section 179 limit increases to $2.5 million, with a $4 million phaseout, both indexed. It applies to business equipment and off-the-shelf software, but it cannot generate a loss.

Bonus Depreciation vs. Section 179

  • Bonus depreciation: No cap, can create a loss.

  • Section 179: Capped and limited to income.

Tip: Use bonus depreciation for large or loss-generating purchases.


SALT Cap Raised

The state and local tax (SALT) itemized deduction cap is increased to $40,000 for 2025 (up from $10,000), with a phaseout for high-income taxpayers. The cap rises to $40,400 in 2026 and then increases by approximately 1% annually through 2029, returning to $10,000 in 2030.

There is a phaseout of the increased SALT cap benefit for modified AGI above $500,000 (or $250,000 for MFS), adjusted upward annually. The cap is reduced by 30% of the excess income above that threshold:
Phaseout amount = 0.30 × (MAGI – $500,000)
For example, on a 2025 joint return with MAGI over $600,000, you will get the minimum $10,000 deduction.

The SALT deduction includes:

  • State and local income taxes

  • Real estate taxes on personal and certain investment property

  • Personal property taxes based on value (e.g., vehicle registration fees in some states)

Taxpayers may elect to deduct state and local sales taxes instead of income taxes, but not both. Foreign income taxes may also be deducted instead of claiming a foreign tax credit. The SALT deduction does not include federal taxes, Social Security or Medicare taxes, fines, or state business taxes like B&O tax or PTET, though PTET can be deducted at the entity level.


PTET Deduction Preserved

There is an IRS-sanctioned workaround to avoid the SALT cap, and OBBBA continues to allow its use. OBBBA preserves the full pass-through entity tax (PTET) deduction for pass-through business entities, including specified service trades or businesses (SSTBs), such as trading firms eligible for TTS.

PTET payments for state and local income taxes are deducted at the entity level as business expenses, with state tax credits flowing through to owners, reducing both regular tax and AMT income.

TTS traders using S-Corps or partnerships in states such as New York, California, New Jersey, and Connecticut can continue leveraging PTET elections to bypass the federal SALT cap. Thirty-seven states offer SALT cap workaround opportunities.


AMT Rules Preserved, SALT Still Disallowed

OBBBA permanently locks in the TCJA-era AMT exemption amounts, indexed for inflation. However, it does not change the disallowance of the SALT deduction for AMT purposes.

Even with the higher $40,000 SALT deduction under regular tax, SALT remains a preference item disallowed when calculating AMTI. This means high-income taxpayers subject to AMT may not benefit from the increased SALT cap unless their AMT exposure is otherwise reduced.

Using a SALT cap workaround in a pass-through entity, you can deduct state and local taxes as PTET rather than as a SALT itemized deduction that’s not deductible for AMT.


Wash Sale (WS) Rules & Crypto

No changes to WS rules on securities. Crypto remains exempt from wash sale rules under Section 1091, as it is not treated as a security for tax purposes.


Carried Interest Rules Unchanged

Carried interest retains its current long-term capital gain treatment, provided a three-year holding period is met.


Broker Reporting & Crypto

No changes to Form 1099-B. IRS Form 1099-DA for crypto remains set for 2026 implementation.


Senior Deduction and Retirement Highlights

New senior bonus deduction: $6,000 (single ) / $12,000 (married) through 2028, phased out starting at $75,000 / $150,000, not indexed for inflation.

Retirement plan rules remain unchanged. 


Other Notable OBBBA Tax Changes

  • Standard deduction increase: Now approximately $15,750 (single) / $31,500 (married), indexed annually

  • Child tax credit: Increased to $2,200 per qualifying child

  • Trump Account: New birth-based custodial savings accounts with tax-deferred growth; annual contribution cap of $5,000 per child, indexed from 2027

  • QSBS exclusion: Increased from $10 million to $15 million

  • Auto loan interest deduction: Up to $10,000 on loans for U.S.-assembled vehicles; phased out over $100,000 / $200,000 AGI

  • Estate tax exemption: TCJA-level exemption of $13.6 million per individual extended through 2033; indexed to $15 million starting in 2026


Summary of Key OBBBA Tax Provisions

Provision Effective Date Expiration / Sunset Notes
Section 475 MTM 2025 None Remains unchanged; not mentioned in OBBBA
Excess Business Loss Limitation 2025 None Made permanent; indexed for inflation
QBI Deduction 2025 None Made permanent; phaseout thresholds indexed from 2026
Bonus Depreciation Jan 19, 2025 None Fully reinstated for qualifying assets
Section 179 Expensing 2025 None Limit increased and indexed
SALT Cap 2025 2029 (reverts 2030) Increased to $40,000; indexed; phaseouts for high income
PTET Deduction 2025 None Preserved under OBBBA
Senior Deduction 2025 2028

$6,000 / $12,000; phaseout not indexed


Conclusion

OBBBA solidifies trader-friendly provisions, including trader tax status and Section 475 MTM, QBI deductions, bonus depreciation, EBL treatment, a higher SALT cap, and PTET SALT cap workarounds, as well as pass-through entity strategies. These reforms enhance tax certainty and planning for active traders.

Take Action: Plan Your 2025 Tax Strategy Today.

Don’t wait until the last minute to take advantage of the trader-friendly reforms in OBBBA. Whether you need help with Section 475 elections, TTS qualification, entity formation planning, or SALT workaround strategies, GreenTraderTax is here to guide you.

📅 Schedule a consultation
🧾 Download Green’s 2025 Trader Tax Guide
💼 Explore our tax compliance services

Visit GreenTraderTax.com or call 888-558-5257 to get started.

Sources: Senate OBBBA text; IRS QBI FAQ; RSM US analysis; Forbes (Kelly Phillips Erb, July 4 & 5, 2025); Gibson Dunn summary; Yeo & Yeo analysis; KBKG commentary.

Author: Robert A. Green, CPA
GreenTraderTax.com

Darren Neuschwander, CPA, contributed to this blog post. 


2024 Year-End Tax Planning Strategies For Active Traders And Investors

October 22, 2024 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

Don’t wait until tax time in April; arrange tax savings before year-end. Learn about deferring income, accelerating deductions, tax-loss selling, avoiding wash sale losses, paying estimated taxes, S-Corp payroll with health and retirement benefits, SALT cap workaround strategies for pass-through entities, and other tax-saving strategies. 

Tax planning for traders at year-end 2024 should be similar to 2023, as tax law is mostly the same in 2024. However, it will be different for 2025 year-end planning.

Most tax provisions for individuals in the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) expire on Dec. 31, 2025. TCJA temporarily reduced income tax rates, roughly doubled the standard deduction, restricted itemized deductions, introduced a state and local tax (SALT) cap and the 20% qualified business income (QBI) deduction on pass-through entities, revised NOL rules, but permanently reduced the corporate tax rate to 21%. Oddly, the corporate tax relief is permanent, and the individual provisions are temporary, which was done to meet budget reconciliation requirements.

The 2025 president and Congress will discuss significant tax changes during 2025, so year-end tax planning in 2025 may differ substantially from 2024. The election results of Nov. 5, 2024, will give telltale signs of tax changes coming in 2026.

Recent tax acts, including the TCJA, 2020 CARES, 2019 and 2022 SECURE, and 2022 IRA, didn’t alter trader tax law, including trader tax status (TTS), Section 475 MTM accounting, wash-sale losses on securities, or the tax treatment on financial products, including futures (Section 1256 contracts) and cryptocurrencies (intangible property). Neither presidential candidate proposed changes to TTS-related benefits.

For year-end planning, it’s helpful to consider the IRS’s annual inflation adjustments in income and capital gains tax brackets, income thresholds, retirement plan contribution limits, standard deductions, etc. See “IRS provides tax inflation adjustments for tax year 2024” and “IRS releases tax inflation adjustments for tax year 2025.” The inflation-adjusted amounts increase by approximately 2.8% from 2024 to 2025, after a rise of 7.1% from 2023 to 2024. 

Trader tax status (TTS) constitutes business expense treatment and unlocks meaningful tax benefits for active traders who qualify. The first step is to determine eligibility. If you qualify for TTS, you can claim some tax breaks, such as business expense treatment, after the fact. TTS traders can also elect and set up other tax breaks—like Section 475 MTM, employee benefit plans (health and retirement), and a SALT cap workaround—on a timely basis. See my golden rules for TTS qualification

DEFER INCOME AND ACCELERATE TAX DEDUCTIONS

If you are in a reasonably high tax bracket for 2024, consider deferring income and accelerating tax deductions to take advantage of a one-year deferral of tax payments.

Income deferral could be suitable for a trader who expects a lower income next year due to retirement, a job change, or other circumstances. For example, a trader may leave employment to pursue full-time trading in 2025. Consider deferring bonuses at work, respecting the constructive receipt of income rule, which means you cannot turn your back on an income payment.

Income deferral reduces AGI and might unlock other tax breaks based on AGI thresholds. Including the 3.8% net investment income tax, qualified business income deduction, non-deductible Roth IRA contributions, deductible traditional IRA contributions, child tax credits, education tax credits, electric vehicle (EV) tax credits, and student loan interest deductions.

Traders eligible for TTS in 2024 should consider accelerating trading business expenses before year-end, such as purchasing computer equipment using tangible property expense and first-year (immediate) expense using Section 179 depreciation.

Consider delaying profitable investments’ realization (sales) to defer capital gains taxes. It also might avoid the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) 3.8% net investment income tax (NIIT) over the MAGI threshold of $200,000 for single filers, $250,000 for married filing jointly, and $125,000 for married filing separately. The IRS does not make annual inflation adjustments for these ACA NIIT thresholds.

Tax loss harvesting: Consider accelerating the sale of losing investments to reduce capital gains or to use the $3,000 capital loss limitation against ordinary income. Net capital losses over this $3,000 allowance may be carried over to subsequent tax years to offset capital gains but not Section 475 ordinary income trading gains. Trading capital gains and losses are combined on Schedule D with investment capital gains and losses.

AVOID YEAR-END WASH SALE LOSSES

Avoid triggering year-end wash sale (WS) losses on securities, which can defer capital losses to subsequent tax years and raise current-year tax liability.

Day and swing traders inevitably trigger many WS loss adjustments amounting to tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars. A WS occurs when you take a loss on a security and repurchase it within 30 days (after or before). For example, sell 100 shares of XXX equity on Dec. 15, 2024, for a $10,000 capital loss and repurchase that same equity position on January 5, 2025. That’s a WS; the $10,000 loss is deferred at year-end 2024 and added to the repurchased position’s cost basis.

WS during the year can be okay if a trader avoids WS loss deferral at year-end. For example, assume a trader has many WS losses on the stock symbol AAPL during the year. If they sell their entire AAPL position by year-end and wait 31 days in Jan. 2025 to repurchase AAPL equity or the equity options on AAPL, there will be no open WS loss deferral on AAPL at year-end 2024.

It can be different with investment positions. Suppose an investor sells an unprofitable AAPL investment position in early Oct. 2024 and triggers a WS when repurchasing AAPL within 30 days in late Oct. 2024 as an investment position. They might want to retain that now profitable AAPL investment position at year-end 2024, which has embedded the WS loss as an additional cost basis. That counts as WS loss deferral, too.

IRS rules require taxpayers to report WS loss adjustments on securities based on substantially identical positions across all accounts, including IRAs. Substantially identical means equity, an option on that equity (equity option), and those options at different exercise dates. 

Suppose a trader sells AAPL for a taxable account loss and repurchases that position in their IRA within 30 days. In that case, it triggers a permanent WS loss in the taxable account, as there is no way to add the WS loss to the cost basis in an IRA account. An IRA account does not trigger WS losses on its account.

The IRS has different WS reporting rules for brokers on Form 1099-B versus those for taxpayers. That has caused significant confusion among taxpayers and tax preparers. Brokers report WS losses on 1099-Bs on identical positions per taxable account. AAPL is identical to AAPL stock only but substantially identical to AAPL options. It would be unreasonable to ask Schwab to combine WS loss reporting with Interactive Brokers. Brokers won’t even calculate WS losses across multiple accounts with the same broker.

This is why active securities traders should use a trade accounting program to identify potential WS loss problems across all their accounts, especially going into year-end, so they have time to avoid year-end deferral of capital losses.

WS losses might be preferable to capital loss carryovers at year-end 2024 for TTS traders. A Section 475 election in 2025 converts year-end 2024 WS losses on TTS positions (not investment positions) into ordinary losses in 2025. That’s better than a capital loss carryover into 2025, which might give you pause when making a 2025 Section 475 election (due April 15, 2025). You want a clean slate with no remaining capital losses before electing Section 475 ordinary income and loss.

There are other ways to avoid WS losses:

  • TTS traders can elect Section 475 MTM by April 15 of the current tax year, and 475 trades are not subject to WS losses. It’s too late to elect 475 for 2024.
  • Absorb a WS loss with a subsequent gain on a substantially identical position.
  • Trade futures (Section 1256 contracts) in Jan. 2025, which breaks the chain on the securities traded with capital losses in Dec. 2024.
  • Trade different ETFs in Jan 2025 than in Dec 2024. For example, numerous ETFs track the S&P 500, which are not substantially identical.

TAX EFFICIENT SALES & ACCOUNTING METHOD

If you want to sell some of your portfolios, consider taking long-term capital gains, which are subject to lower tax rates (0%, 15%, and 20%), rather than short-term capital gains, which are taxed at ordinary rates as high as 37%.

That might require using the “specific identification accounting method” vs. first-in-first-out. (See FIFO vs. Specific Identification Accounting Methods.)

0% long term capital gains rate: If you have a low income, consider realizing long-term capital gains at the 0% rate by selling open positions for over 12 months. The (long-term) capital gains tax rates are 0%, 15%, and 20%. 

The 2024 zero capital gains rate applies to singles with taxable income under $47,025, married couples filing jointly under $94,050, and heads of household under $63,000.

Caution: If you go $1 over the zero-rate bracket, all long-term gains are subject to the 15% capital gains rate. This rate doesn’t work like progressive marginal ordinary tax brackets.

See the 2024 and 2025 capital gains tax brackets and more at https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/2024-tax-brackets/  and https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/2025-tax-brackets/

STRADDLES AND CONSTRUCTIVE SALE RULES

The IRS has rules to prevent income deferral and loss acceleration in offsetting positions that lack sufficient economic risk. These rules include straddles, the constructive sale rule, and shorting against the box.

Selling the losing legs on a complex options trade with offsetting positions can trigger the straddle loss deferral rules.

In the old days, owners stored stock certificates in safe deposit boxes. They could borrow and sell securities, but not those stored in their box — hence the moniker, “short sale against the box.” It became a popular tax shelter to defer capital gains taxes.

The Taxpayer Relief Act of 1997 mostly closed the deferral loophole by adding Section 1259, Constructive Sales Treatment for Appreciated Financial Positions. Before these changes, a trader could own security A with a significant unrealized capital gain and short it against the box before year-end to freeze the capital gain economically but defer its realization until the following year.

Exception: A trader can still achieve tax deferral on an open short against the box position at year-end if they buy to cover the open short position by Jan. 30 and leave the long position available throughout the 60 days beginning on the date they close the transaction. So, there is an economic risk. Please see an example from Pub. 550 Investment Income and Expenses, Short Sales.

The constructive sale rules apply to substantially identical properties, which include equities, equity options (including put options), futures, and other contracts. For example, Apple’s equity is substantially identical to Apple’s call-and-put equity options. Traders use various financial products and may inadvertently trigger Section 1259 constructive sales. Report gains on constructive sales, not losses.

Brokers only report constructive sales on appreciated positions on Form 1099-Bs if you request it quickly. Otherwise, traders need to make manual adjustments on Form 8949.

See our Tax Center on Short Selling.

ACCELERATE INCOME AND DEFER CERTAIN EXPENSES

A TTS trader with significant Section 475 ordinary losses should consider accelerating income. Try to advance enough income to use the standard deduction and take advantage of lower marginal tax brackets. Stay below the threshold for unlocking various AGI-dependent deductions and credits.

A new trader in 2024 may have a low trading income after leaving a high-paying job at the end of 2023. They expect to be in a higher tax bracket in 2025, so they accelerate their income to 2024 to take advantage of lower tax brackets.

EXCESS BUSINESS LOSSES AND NET OPERATING LOSSES

TTS traders with a Section 475 election might incur ordinary business losses for 2024. Before the TCJA commenced in 2018, a TTS/475 trader could carry back a net operating loss (NOL) for two years, generating an immediate tax refund. TCJA repealed NOL carrybacks (except for farmers) and limited NOL carryforwards to 80% of the subsequent year’s taxable income.

The TCJA introduced an excess business loss (EBL) limitation. Excess losses over the limit are carried forward as NOLs. The EBL threshold is $610,000 for joint filers in 2024 ($626,000 in 2025) and $305,000 ($313,000 in 2025) for all other filers.

The 2020 pandemic-relief CARES Act suspended the TCJA’s EBL and NOL changes for 2018, 2019, and 2020 and allowed five-year NOL carrybacks (e.g., a 2020 NOL carryback to 2015). The TCJA’s EBL and NOL carryforward rules apply for tax years 2021 through 2028. Interim tax legislation extended the expiration date by three years for EBL and NOL changes only.

ROTH IRA CONVERSION

Evaluate changing a traditional IRA or 401(k) into a Roth IRA. Distributions from a standard retirement plan are taxed as ordinary income (not capital gains), whereas with a Roth IRA, distributions in retirement years are tax-free.

On the conversion date, the market value of the traditional retirement account is taxed at ordinary rates. Subsequent growth in the Roth IRA account is tax-free. If your retirement portfolio is depressed, you might enjoy recovery of values inside a Roth IRA.

The TCJA repealed the recharacterization option, so you can no longer reverse the conversion if the plan assets decline. Since major stock indexes are currently at record highs, conversion may not be wise.

Generally, there’s a 10% excise tax on early withdrawals from retirement plans before age 59½. With a Roth IRA conversion, you can avoid excise tax by paying conversion taxes outside the Roth plan. Roth IRA conversions have no income limit, unlike regular Roth IRA contributions. 

NET INVESTMENT INCOME TAX

Investment fees and expenses are not deductible when calculating net investment income (NII) for the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) 3.8% net investment tax (NIT). NIT only applies to individuals with NII and modified adjusted gross income (AGI) exceeding $200,000 single, $250,000 married filing jointly, or $125,000 married filing separately. The IRS does not index these ACA thresholds for inflation. NII includes portfolio income, capital gains, and Section 475 ordinary income.

BUSINESS EXPENSES AND ITEMIZED VS. STANDARD DEDUCTION

Business expenses: TTS traders are entitled to business and home office deductions from gross income. The home office deduction requires income, except for the mortgage interest and real property tax portion.

TTS traders can deduct tangible personal property like a computer, up to $2,500 per item, providing the taxpayer files a Sec. 1.263(a)-1(f) safe harbor election with the tax return. They can also use Section 179 first-year expense, bonus, or regular depreciation on computers, equipment, furniture, and fixtures (over $2,500 per item). Traders with TTS in 2024 may consider going on a shopping spree before Jan. 1, 2025. There is no sense in deferring TTS expenses because you cannot be sure you will qualify for TTS in 2025.

Employee business expenses: Ask your employer if they have an accountable plan for reimbursing employee business expenses. You must “use it or lose it” before year-end. TCJA suspended unreimbursed employee business expenses and miscellaneous itemized deductions through tax year 2025. TTS S-Corps should use an accountable plan to reimburse employee business expenses since the trader/owner is its employee.

Unreimbursed partnership expenses: Partners in LLCs taxed as partnerships can deduct unreimbursed partnership expenses (UPE). That is how they usually deduct home office expenses. UPE is more convenient than an S-Corp accountable plan because the partner can arrange the UPE after year-end. The IRS doesn’t want S-Corps to use UPE.

SALT cap: TCJA capped itemized deductions for state and local income, sales, and property taxes (SALT) at $10,000 per year ($5,000 for married filing separately) and did not index it for inflation. About 36 states enacted SALT cap workaround laws. Search “(Your state) SALT cap workaround” to learn the details. 

Most states follow a blueprint approved by the IRS. Generally, elect to make pass-through entity (PTE) payments on a partnership or S-Corp tax return filed by your business. It doesn’t work with a sole proprietorship filing a Schedule C. PTE is a business expense deduction shown on the state Schedule K-1. Most states credit the individual’s state income tax liability with the PTE amount or most of it. Essentially, you convert a non-deductible SALT itemized deduction (over the cap) into a business expense deduction from gross income. Act well before year-end; otherwise, you might delay the benefit to next year.

TCJA’s SALT cap expires at the end of 2025. California stated it would end its SALT cap workaround if Congress let the SALT cap expire. Look into how your state would handle it.

Investment fees and expenses: The TCJA suspended all miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor, including investment fees and costs. An example is fees paid to an RIA for managing investments. Brokerage commissions are not investment fees; commissions are included in capital gains, deducted from proceeds, and added to the cost basis.

TCJA did not suspend an itemized deduction for investment-interest expenses limited to investment income, with the excess as a carryover.

Standard deduction: The TCJA roughly doubled the 2018 standard deduction and suspended and curtailed several itemized deductions. For 2024, with an inflation adjustment, the IRS increased the standard deduction to $29,200 for married couples filing jointly, $14,600 for single/married couples filing separately, and $21,900 for heads of household. There is an additional $1,550 for married seniors and $1,950 for unmarried seniors.

Many taxpayers use the standard deduction. For convenience, some taxpayers may feel inclined to stop tracking itemized deductions because they figure they will use the standard deduction. Don’t overlook the impact of itemized deductions on state tax filings, where you might get some tax relief.

CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS

In 2024, there will be no non-itemized above-the-line deduction for charitable contributions, as there was temporarily in recent years. Individuals who want to deduct charitable contributions must use itemized deductions.

Individuals may itemize contributions to charitable organizations up to a percentage of AGI. Through 2025, the rate is 60% for cash contributions and 30% for noncash donations.

You may also donate appreciated securities to charity. This will give you a charitable deduction at the fair market value and avoid capital gains taxes. (Billionaires use this strategy, and you can use it.)

Consider a charitable remainder trust to group philanthropic contributions for itemizing deductions and taking a standard deduction in off-years. A donor-advised fund provides similar flexibility.

Qualified charitable distributions (QCDs) allow individuals aged 70 1/2 or older to donate directly from their traditional IRA to eligible charities. The QCD distribution is excluded from taxable income, and there is no charitable deduction. The 2024 maximum QCD limit is $105,000 per person. 

HEALTH SAVINGS ACCOUNT

A trader can take an AGI deduction for a contribution to a health savings account (HSA) without qualifying for TTS, having a source of earned income, or self-employment income.

A high-deductible health plan (HDHP) is required for an HSA contribution. The annual contribution to an HSA for 2024 is limited to $4,150 for an individual HDHP and $8,300 for a family HDHP. Individuals aged 55 or older can make a catch-up contribution of $1,000.

ESTIMATED INCOME TAXES

Taxpayers should pay federal and state estimated taxes owed by Jan. 15, 2025, and the balance by April 15, 2025. Those who have reached the SALT cap don’t need to prepay 2024 state-estimated income taxes by Dec. 31, 2024 (a strategy before TCJA).

Many traders skip making quarterly estimated tax payments on capital gains or 475 income during the year, figuring they might incur trading losses later in the year. They can catch up with the Q4 estimate due by Jan. 15, 2025, but might still owe an underpayment penalty for Q1 through Q3 quarters. Some rely on the safe harbor exception to cover their prior year’s taxes. (See Traders Should Focus On Q4 Estimated Taxes Due January 16.)

The underestimated tax penalty is higher in 2024 than in prior years, at approximately 8%.

ADJUST WITHHOLDING

Employees should consider withholding additional taxes on year-end paychecks. This helps avoid underpayment penalties, as the IRS treats wage withholding as being made throughout the year. This loophole applies to officers and owners of TTS S-Corps.

20% DEDUCTION ON QUALIFIED BUSINESS INCOME

In 2018, TCJA introduced a new tax deduction for pass-through businesses, including sole proprietors, partnerships, and S-Corps. Subject to haircuts and limitations, a pass-through business could be eligible for a 20% deduction on qualified business income (QBI).

Because TTS traders are considered a “specified service trade or business” (SSTB), taxable income above the following threshold is not deductible: $383,900/$191,950 (married/other taxpayers) for 2024, and $394,600/$197,300 (married/other taxpayers) for 2025.

There is also a phase-out range above the threshold of $100,000/$50,000 (married/other taxpayers). Within this range, the W-2 wage and property basis limitations apply. TTS traders with an S-Corp usually have wages, whereas sole proprietor traders do not.

QBI for traders includes Section 475 ordinary income and loss and trading business expenses. QBI excludes capital gains and losses, Section 988 forex income or loss, dividends, and interest income.

Try to manage your AGI to stay within the QBI threshold.

S-CORP OFFICER COMPENSATION

TTS traders use an S-Corp to arrange health insurance and retirement plan deductions. These deductions require earned income or self-employment income. A TTS S-corp salary is earned income, unlike unearned income trading gains.

S-Corps pay officer compensation in conjunction with employee benefit deductions through payroll tax compliance done before year-end 2024. Otherwise, traders miss the boat.

TTS is necessary since an S-Corp investment company cannot have tax-deductible wages, health insurance, or retirement plan contributions. A trading S-Corp is not required to have “reasonable compensation,” so a TTS trader may determine officer compensation based on how much to reimburse for health insurance and how much they want to contribute to a retirement plan. Sole proprietors and partnership TTS traders cannot pay salaries to 2% or more owners; hence, they need an S-Corp.

S-Corp wages impact the SALT cap workaround, as it hinges on net income after wages. If you fall into the QBI phase-out range, wages are required to increase the QBI deduction. This decision-making has many moving levers and parts, so consult your CPA for year-end tax planning early in December. Payroll planning and execution take some time, so act well before the year-end.

S-CORP HEALTH INSURANCE

S-Corps may deduct health insurance for only the months it was operational and qualified for TTS. Employer-provided health insurance, including Cobra, is not deductible.

The S-corp reimburses the employee/owner through the accountable reimbursement plan before year-end. The company adds the health insurance reimbursement to taxable wages but does not withhold Social Security or Medicare taxes from that portion of W-2 compensation. The officer/owner takes an AGI deduction for health insurance on their tax return. It’s quirky.

S-CORP RETIREMENT PLAN CONTRIBUTION

TTS S-Corps can unlock a retirement plan deduction by paying sufficient officer compensation in Dec. 2024 when results for the year are evident. Net income after deducting wages and retirement contributions should be positive. Creating a salary that generates losses is inappropriate.

Establishing a Solo 401(k) retirement plan with a financial intermediary is necessary before the year-end. The plan includes the 100%-deductible elective deferral up to a 2024 maximum of $23,000 (or $30,500 if aged 50 or older with the $7,500 catch-up provision) on the Dec. 2024 paycheck and annual W-2. You have one month to pay the elective deferral into the Solo 401(k) plan in Jan. 2025.

You can pay the 25%-deductible profit-sharing plan (PSP) portion of the S-Corp Solo 401(k) up to a maximum of $46,000 by the 2024 S-Corp tax return due date, including an extension, which means Sept. 15, 2025. For 2024, the maximum PSP contribution requires wages of $184,000 ($46,000 divided by a 25% defined contribution rate).

Tax planning calculations will show the various projected outcomes of income tax savings vs. payroll tax costs. Paying into social security builds retirement benefits, as the Social Security Administration (SSA) looks back at your highest 35 years of earnings (salaries) when calculating your retirement benefit.

Consider a Solo 401(k) Roth for the elective-deferral portion only. The contribution is not deductible, but the contribution and growth within the Roth are permanently tax-free. Traditional plans have a tax deduction upfront, and all distributions are subject to ordinary income taxes in retirement.

Traditional retirement plans have required minimum distributions (RMD) by age 72 (73 if you reach age 72 after Dec. 31, 2022), whereas Roth plans don’t have RMD.

Distributions from traditional retirement plans generate ordinary income, so manage that lever well to achieve AGI thresholds.

HAVE YOUR NEW ENTITY READY ON JAN. 1, 2025

If you missed employee benefits (health insurance and retirement contributions) in 2024, consider an LLC with an S-Corp election for the tax year 2025. Or you may want a spousal-member LLC taxed as a partnership for 2025 to maximize the SALT cap workaround and segregate trading from investing.

Consider the following plan to be ready to trade on the first trading day of Jan. 2025. Form a single-member LLC in mid-Dec. 2024, obtain the employee identification number (EIN), and open the LLC brokerage account before year-end to be ready to trade as of Jan. 1, 2025.

The single-member LLC is a “disregarded entity” for the tax year 2024, which avoids an entity tax return filing for the 2024 initial short year. You can add your spouse as an LLC member on Jan. 1, 2025, creating a partnership tax return for 2025. 

Alternatively, if you want health insurance and retirement plan deductions for 2025, your single-member or spousal-member LLC should submit a 2025 S-Corp election within 75 days of Jan. 1, 2025.

The partnership or S-Corp is deemed a “new taxpayer” in 2025, so it can make an internal resolution within 75 days of Jan. 1, 2025, to elect Section 475 MTM on securities for 2025. Otherwise, an existing partnership or S-Corp must file an external 475 election statement with the IRS by March 15, 2025.

TAX RELIEF: PRESIDENTIALLY DECLARED DISASTER AREAS

In 2024, several disasters, including hurricanes, flooding, tornadoes, wildfires, and railcar accidents, occurred. Check the IRS.gov website for Tax Relief in disaster situations. Click the button to get information about your state.

GIFTS AND ESTATE TAXES

The annual gift tax exclusion is $18,000 for 2024 and $19,000 for 2025.

The unified estate and gift tax exemption for those who die in 2024 is $13,610,000; for those who die in 2025, it’s $13,990,000; and for married couples in 2024, it’s $27,220,000.

The estate tax exemption was significantly increased under the TCJA but will expire at the end of 2025. It’s nearly double the pre-TCJA exemption levels. The increased exemption is scheduled to expire on Dec. 31, 2025. If Congress does not extend the current exemption, the estate tax exemption will revert to pre-TCJA levels in 2026, adjusted for inflation. Estimates suggest the exemption may drop to approximately $7.5 million per individual and $14.5 million for married couples in 2026. Check your state for estate tax rules, too.

Tax laws and regulations can change, so it is prudent to consult a tax professional for the most up-to-date information and personalized advice.

Star Johnson, CPA, contributed to this blog post. 


The Tax Cuts And Jobs Act Mainly Expires In 2025

April 29, 2024 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

Most of the tax changes in the 2017 Tax Cuts & Jobs Act (TCJA) expire (sunset) at the end of 2025. TCJA featured tax cuts and some tax hikes to help pay for it. Meanwhile, TCJA’s massive tax cut lowering the corporate tax rate to 21% does not expire.

Accountants and taxpayers have grown accustomed to TCJA, although they were whipsawed by the 2020 CARES Act, which temporarily forestalled several tax-hike provisions. Switching back to pre-TCJA law starting in tax year 2026 might be awkward, and it could become confusing if Congress turns tax law upside down again.

With a lame-duck-divided 2024 Congress, I don’t expect significant tax law changes until 2025, when most TCJA provisions expire. I also don’t expect Congress to implement substantial tax law changes until the last minute before the 2025 year-end fiscal cliff. The November 2024 presidential and Congressional election might give us clues about coming tax changes.

TCJA permanent provision:

The 21% corporate flat tax rate enacted under the TCJA is permanent and does not expire. Before the TCJA, the federal corporate income tax rate was graduated, with a top marginal rate of 35%. Lowering the corporate rate was the principal tax cut in TCJA.

Pass-through entities (PTE) like LLC/partnerships and S-Corps don’t qualify for the corporate tax break, so Congress equalized PTE businesses with a 20% qualified business income deduction (QBID). However, QBID sunsets in 2025.

Will the 2025 Congress consider extending QBID, provided they don’t increase the corporate tax rate? QBID has been a complex tax compliance issue for taxpayers and tax professionals. Many small businesses at all income levels benefit from QBI.

TCJA sunset provisions:

Most of TCJA’s tax cuts and tax-hike provisions were initially set to expire in 2025.

The list below includes some of these provisions. For a complete list of expiring tax provisions in TCJA, see Congressional Research Services (CRS) Reference Table: Expiring Provisions in the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.”

Marginal tax rates—The lower marginal tax rates in TCJA expire at the end of 2025. Individual tax rates will return to pre-TCJA levels starting in 2026. It’s important to note that lower TCJA tax rates apply throughout the marginal tax brackets, helping taxpayers at all income levels.

“Marginal rates will revert to their permanent pre-TCJA levels of 10%, 15%, 25%, 28%, 33%, 35%, and 39.6%. Aside from the first two brackets (10% and 15%) these rates apply over different ranges of taxable income than the TCJA rates. These income ranges are annually adjusted for inflation,” per the CRS report.

Increased standard deduction—TCJA’s roughly doubled standard deduction (indexed for inflation) returns to pre-TCJA levels on January 1, 2026. Looking back, Congress achieved its goal of more taxpayers using the standard deduction, making tax compliance more accessible and straightforward.

“The basic standard deduction amounts will revert to their TCJA levels and then be adjusted for inflation. For 2018, prior to the TCJA, the basic standard deduction amounts for 2018 would have been $6,500 for single filers, $9,550 for head of household filers, and $13,000 for married taxpayers filing jointly,” per CRS report.

Itemized deductions—Before the TCJA, taxpayers could deduct many more itemized deductions on Schedule A. This included “miscellaneous itemized deductions” over 2% of adjusted gross income (AGI), including investment expenses, unreimbursed employee business expenses, and tax compliance expenses. Before TCJA, alternative minimum tax (AMT) disallowed miscellaneous itemized deductions.

Of the few allowed itemized deductions, TCJA reduced and revised them. See the CRS report for mortgage interest deductions and changes in charitable deductions. TCJA suspended personal casualty losses as itemized deductions, except for losses in a federally declared disaster area.

Active traders eligible for trader tax status (TTS) deduct trading business expenses on Schedule C as sole proprietors, bypassing Schedule A. TTS traders also deduct business expenses on pass-through entity tax returns. TTS was better than investor status before and during the TCJA, and it should stand up well to tax changes coming next year.

State and local taxes— TCJA limits a SALT itemized deduction to $10,000, which led many taxpayers to take the roughly doubled standard deduction instead of itemizing. The SALT cap was not indexed for inflation.

Starting in 2026, the $10,000 cap will not apply, and taxpayers can deduct all eligible state and local income, sales (instead of income), property taxes, and foreign income taxes. They will also be able to deduct foreign real property taxes. AMT does not allow a state and local tax itemized deduction.

Pass-through entities (PTE), including partnerships (general, limited, and LLCs) and S-corps, can utilize a SALT cap workaround in more than 30 states. The workaround treats PTE state tax payments as business expenses rather than non-deductible SALT payments. The taxpayer takes a tax credit on their state tax return for the entity-level PTE payments, thereby avoiding double taxation. California’s SALT cap workaround expires in 2025 in sync with TCJA’s SALT cap expiration.  The SALT cap workaround in other states may expire as well.

20% qualified business income deduction (QBID)—The QBID for non-corporate business owners, including sole proprietors, partnerships, LLC/partnerships, and S-Corps, expires at the end of 2025. It is a significant tax cut for small businesses, especially those not classified as a “specified trade or business” (SSTB).

Traders eligible for TTS are SSTB. TTS expenses and Section 475 ordinary trading income or loss are included in QBI, excluding capital gains and losses, and portfolio income. Many traders have received a QBID tax benefit.

Excess business losses (EBL)—The TCJA created the EBL limitation for 2018 through 2025 as a tax hike to help pay for the TCJA tax cuts. Subsequent legislation extended the EBL expiration date to 2028. The 2020 CARES Act delayed the EBL, pushing the start date to 2021. 

Under TCJA, add the excess business losses over the EBL threshold to a net operating loss (NOL) carryforward.

The EBL is inflation-adjusted; it’s $610,000 (for joint returns)/$305,000 (for other taxpayers) for 2024. When this provision expires, there will be no EBL limitation.

EBL includes TTS expenses and Section 475 ordinary trading losses for TTS traders. Section 475 gains can offset other business losses before applying the EBL limitation.

Net operating losses (NOLs)—The TCJA, as a tax hike, repealed two-year NOL carrybacks and revised NOL carryforwards. However, CARES temporarily allowed five-year NOL carrybacks for 2018 through 2020. TCJA NOL rules came back in effect for 2021 through 2025.

TCJA limits NOL carryforwards to 80% of taxable income (100% pre-TCJA), with the balance carrying over to the subsequent year (limited to 20 years pre-TCJA). In 2026, two-year NOL carrybacks and the 100% NOL carryforward rules will apply.

Increased estate exemption—TCJA’s roughly doubled unified estate and gift tax exemption amount will return to the pre-TCJA amount of $5 million (indexed for inflation) as of January 1, 2026. That inflation-adjusted amount for 2026 is expected to be approximately $7 million. That’s a significant reduction from the 2024 unified estate and gift tax exemption of $13.61 million.

With an estate portability election, a married couple can have an exemption of up to $27.22 million for 2024. Post-TCJA, it could be around $14 million. The estate amount over the exemption amount is subject to a 40% federal estate tax.

Don’t overlook state estate taxes. Twelve states (and DC) have estate tax laws, and six have an inheritance tax. Eight states have an estate tax rate of 16%, a few are 12%, and Washington and Hawaii are 20%. For 2024, Connecticut matches the federal exemption amount but does not allow surviving spouse exemption portability. Other states range between $1 million for Oregon and $6.9 million for New York.

Star Johnson, CPA, contributed to this blog post.


How Covid-19 Tax Relief & Aid Legislation Impacts Traders (Updates)

May 31, 2020 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

Tax tips for the July 15 deadline, extensions, 475 elections, NOL carrybacks, CARES relief, and more.

Update June 29: “IRS today announced the tax filing and payment deadline of July 15 will not be postponed. Individual taxpayers unable to meet the July 15 due date can request an automatic extension of time to file until Oct. 15 – it is not an extension to pay any taxes due. For people facing hardships, including those affected by COVID-19, who cannot pay in full, the IRS has several options available to help.” (See Taxpayers should file by July 15 tax deadline; automatic extension to Oct. 15 available.)

Watch our Webinar or recording Last-Minute Tax Tips & Extensions For Traders.

Original post

Congress postponed the tax filing and payment deadline from April 15 to July 15, 2020, for 2019 individual tax returns, extensions, and 2020 elections (i.e., Section 475). That’s good news for sole proprietor traders.

The July 15 deadline also applies to calendar-year 2019 C-Corps, U.S. residents abroad, estates, trusts, gift tax returns, information returns, IRA, and HSA contributions originally due April 1, or later.

Partnerships and S-Corps
Calendar-year 2019 partnership and S-Corp tax returns and 2020 Section 475 elections for partnerships and S-Corps were due March 16, 2020. These pass-through tax returns and entity 475 elections are not eligible for the July 15 postponement deadline because the March 16 deadline was before April 1. IRS virus relief guidance mentions pass-through entities, but that’s for a fiscal-year partnership or S-Corp tax return due on or after April 1, 2020.

Traders have calendar-year partnerships and S-Corps, so their entities are not eligible for the July 15 postponement relief. Some asked our firm if their existing partnership or S-Corp could take advantage of the postponed deadline for making a 2020 Section 475 MTM election. The answer is no.

Extensions for individual taxpayers
If you need more time to file your 2019 individual income tax return, file an automatic extension (Form 4868) for three additional months until October 15, 2020.

If you cannot pay the taxes you owe for 2019, then it’s essential to file the one-page extension to avoid IRS late-filing penalties of 5% per month for up to five months. The IRS charges this penalty based on the tax balance due. On Form 4868, enter your estimate of total tax liability for 2019, total 2019 payments, including overpayment credits, balance due, and the amount you’re paying. “If your return is more than 60 days late, the minimum penalty is $330 (adjusted for inflation) or the balance of the tax due on your return, whichever is smaller.” Even if you cannot pay any amount due, filing the extension on time avoids the late-filing penalty.

The IRS also charges late-payment penalties if the taxpayer does not pay at least 90% of their 2019 tax liability by the postponed deadline of July 15, 2020. The late-payment penalty is 0.5% per month, for up to five months, for a maximum of 2.5%. It’s ten times less than the late-filing penalty. For example, if the taxpayer owes $50,000 by July 15 but doesn’t pay it until October 15, 2020, the total penalty is $750 (three months of 0.5% equals 1.5% times $50,000).

The IRS allows the taxpayer to request abatement of late-payment and late-filing penalties based on a “reasonable cause.” Contracting coronavirus in your family or being negatively impacted by the virus might constitute a reasonable cause. “Attach a statement to your return, fully explaining the reason. Don’t attach the statement to Form 4868.”

The IRS calculates penalties and interest based on the tax payment paid after July 15.

The current interest rate on late payments is 4.5%, and the IRS does not forgive interest charges.

2020 estimated taxes
Treasury also postponed Q1 and Q2 quarterly estimated tax payments for 2020 until July 15, 2020. The original due dates were April 15 for Q1 and June 15 for Q2. Third and fourth quarters keep their original due dates of September 15, 2020, and January 15, 2021, respectively.

Mark your payment memo “2020 Form 1040-ES,” so the IRS does not confuse it with 2019 tax payments. Consider overpaying the 2019 extension, planning for an overpayment credit to apply to 2020 estimated taxes.

States also postponed the deadline
All states with a personal income tax have extended their April 15 due dates. See AICPA state filing conformity chart that they update.

Check if your state is decoupling from CARES, such as for NOL carrybacks. That’s happened in prior stimulus legislation.

Consider a section 475 election by July 15
If you have 2020 YTD trading losses and are eligible for trader tax status (TTS) as a sole proprietor, consider a 475 election on securities and or commodities due by July 15, 2020, the postponed tax deadline. Many traders have massive trading losses in 2020, and they desperately need a 475 election for ordinary loss treatment to unlock NOL carryback refunds.

Section 475 ordinary losses offset all types of income, which navigates around the $3,000 capital loss limitation. Section 475 securities trades are also exempt from wash-sale loss adjustments, which can create phantom income and capital gains taxes. I call Section 475, “tax loss insurance.” I generally recommend 475 for securities only to retain lower 60/40 capital gains rates on commodities (Section 1256 contracts). Section 475 does not apply to segregated investment positions so that you can enjoy deferral and long-term capital gains treatment, too.

There’s also a 20% QBI deduction on 475 income, net of TTS expenses. QBI excludes capital gains and portfolio income. Trading is a “specified service activity,” so you must be under the taxable income threshold of $326,600/$163,300 (married/other taxpayers) for 2020 to be eligible for the QBI tax deduction on TTS/475 income.

Be careful to follow the election rules properly. Attach a 2020 Section 475 election statement to your 2019 individual income tax return or extension filed by July 15, 2020.

E-filing an extension is convenient, but taxpayers cannot attach an election statement to an e-filed extension. Print the extension, attach the election, and mail or fax them together to the IRS.

If you are ready to file your tax return by July 15, there might be a problem: Most tax preparation software programs for consumers don’t include 475 elections. Either mail the 2019 tax return with 2020 Section 475 election statement attached, or e-file the tax return and send the election to the IRS separately by July 15. (See an example election statement and information about Form 3115 in Green’s 2020 Trader Tax Guide, chapter 2.)

CARES allows five-year NOL carrybacks
Starting with the 2018 tax year, TCJA repealed two-year NOL carrybacks and only allowed NOL carryforwards limited to 80% of the subsequent year’s taxable income. TCJA introduced the “excess business loss” (EBL) limitation, where aggregate business losses over an EBL threshold ($500,000 for married and $250,000 for other taxpayers for 2018) were considered an NOL carryforward. TCJA deferred losses into the future.

CARES suspended TCJA’s EBL limitation for 2018, 2019, and 2020. It also allows five-year NOL carrybacks for 2018, 2019, and 2020 and/or 100% application of NOL carryforwards.

Business owners should consider amending 2018 and 2019 tax returns to remove EBL limitations and consider five-year NOL carryback refund claims. It’s too late to elect 475 ordinary loss treatment for 2018 and 2019; a 2019 Section 475 election was due April 15, 2019. 2020 NOL carrybacks must wait until 2021 unless Congress speeds up that process with more virus legislation.

Businesses have until June 30, 2020, to file a 2018 Form 1045 (quickie refund) for a 2018 NOL carryback. They should get moving on these NOL carrybacks ASAP. Otherwise, they need Form 1040-X, which allows the IRS more time to process the refund.

TTS traders with Section 475 ordinary losses and those without 475 but who have significant NOLs from expenses (i.e., borrow fees on short-selling) should consider NOL carrybacks. If Congress changes the rules again (see below), your refund claim should be respected by the IRS as you filed based on current law in effect at the time.

The House passed new virus legislation
The House recently passed new virus legislation, backtracking on CARES business loss relief. However, the Senate rejected taking up this new House legislation. The House law restricts taxpayers to carry back NOLs from 2019 and 2020 only to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018.

The House legislation retains EBL limitations for 2018, 2019, and 2020 and it lifts the SALT limitation for 2020 and 2021. Proponents of the House bill argued that CARES business loss relief mostly benefits the wealthy. Proponents of CARES claim small businesses, plenty of which are not wealthy, need NOL carryback refunds to replenish their capital to remain in business — a goal for virus relief. Opponents of the House bill say lifting SALT helps mostly upper-income taxpayers. Pundits expect Congress to enact more virus legislation, so stay tuned.

CARES tax relief and economic aid
CARES offered tax relief and economic aid to employees, independent contractors, sole proprietors, and other types of small businesses. However, traders don’t fit into usual categories, so there are issues in applying for some CARES tax relief and aid.

Traders generate “unearned income,” and the CARES Act focuses on “earned income” (jobs). Traders eligible for trader tax status (TTS) operating in an S-Corp might be able to receive state and federal unemployment benefits if they close their trading business due to the negative impact of the pandemic.

TTS traders don’t qualify for a loan under the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), or any other SBA loan because trading is considered a “speculative business,” which the SBA bars from its lending programs.

TTS traders might be eligible for NOL carrybacks, relaxed retirement plan distributions, and recovery rebates.

Taxpayers negatively impacted by Covid-19 can take a withdrawal from an IRA or qualified retirement plan of up to a maximum of $100,000 in 2020 and be exempt from the 10% excise tax on “early withdrawals.” The taxpayer has the option of returning (rolling over) the funds within three years or paying income taxes on the 2020 distribution over three years. CARES also suspended required minimum distributions for 2020.

Here’s an example
My client, Josh, was recently laid off due to Covid-19. He is collecting state unemployment insurance plus federal pandemic relief of $600 per week. Josh is eligible for the $100,000 early withdrawal from his employer 401(k), and he can pay taxes or roll it over during the following three years, depending on how things work out. Josh plans to use a 401(k) early withdrawal of $50,000 to finance a new TTS sole proprietorship.

Josh’s TTS Schedule C does not conflict with his unemployment insurance benefits because he is buying and selling capital assets and not collecting a salary. Josh plans to submit a Section 475 election on securities only for 2020, due by July 15, 2020. He wants tax loss insurance and to be eligible for a 20% QBI deduction.

Next year, after Josh’s unemployment insurance ends, he might form a TTS S-Corp to have a salary in December to unlock health-insurance and retirement-plan deductions. S-Corp salary would conflict with unemployment insurance. (It’s always best to check with your state.) The financial markets are highly volatile in 2020, so there’s an opportunity for traders, especially with zero commissions. Josh operates his trading business from home, where he is safer from the pandemic. Brokers have reported strong growth in new trading accounts.

See blog posts:
April 15 Tax Deadline Moved To July 15 (Live Updates)
Massive Market Losses? Elect 475 For Enormous Tax Savings
How Traders Should Mine the CARES Act For Tax Relief & Aid
Tax Extensions: 12 Tips To Save You Money
IRS Coronavirus Tax Relief

Darren Neuschwander CPA contributed to this blog post.

 


How Traders Should Mine the CARES Act For Tax Relief & Aid

April 10, 2020 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

The CARES Act provides tax relief and economic aid to employees, independent contractors, sole proprietors, and other types of small businesses. However, traders don’t fit into usual small-business categories, so there are issues in applying for some CARES aid.

Traders eligible for trader tax status (TTS) operating in an S-Corp might be able to receive state and federal unemployment benefits. TTS S-Corps might not qualify for a forgivable loan under the Small Business Administration Paycheck Protection Program because trading is a “speculative business.” TTS traders structured as sole proprietors, partnerships, or S-Corps might be eligible for five-year NOL carrybacks, relaxed retirement plan distributions, and recovery rebates.

A trader’s capital gains and Section 475 ordinary income are different from wages, earned income, and self-employment income (SEI) required for many of the business-related benefits under CARES. TTS sole proprietors report business expenses on Schedule C, but trading gains and losses go on other tax forms, including Schedule D (capital gains and losses) or Form 4797 (Section 475 ordinary gain or loss). In the eyes of government agencies, trading generates investment income derived from the sale of capital assets; it’s not a usual small business with revenue.

State and federal unemployment benefits
CARES provides Federal Pandemic Unemployment Compensation (FPUC). The Department of Labor says, “states will administer an additional $600 weekly payment to certain eligible individuals who are receiving other benefits.” CARES also gives states the option of extending unemployment compensation to independent contractors and other workers who are ordinarily ineligible for unemployment benefits. (See Unemployment Insurance Relief During COVID-19 Outbreak, which lists contact information for state unemployment insurance offices.)

TTS S-Corps pay officer compensation to the owner/trader to arrange deductions for owner health insurance premiums and/or a high-deductible retirement plan contribution. Few TTS S-Corps hire outside employees, although some employ a spouse or an adult child.

Many of these TTS S-Corps paid state unemployment insurance (SUI) on officer wages, and if terminated or furloughed, these employees might be eligible to collect SUI and FPUC. SUI premiums are a minor cost in most states. In New York state, the 2020 wage base per employee is limited to $11,600. The NYSUI premium for a new business is 3.2%, which is $371 on the wage base amount. Employers can claim exemption from paying SUI on officer/owner compensation in most states.

TTS sole proprietor and partnership traders will likely face challenges applying for SUI and FPUC because they didn’t pay for SUI premiums. They also don’t have self-employment income as sole proprietors and partners. Most TTS traders worked from a home office and continued to trade throughout the coronavirus crisis. An employer or client has not terminated or furloughed them during the crisis. If you think you might be eligible for SUI and FPUC, apply at your state unemployment office.

SBA Paycheck Protection Program (PPP)
According to the AICPA’s SBA issues details for Paycheck Protection Program loans, “The CARES Act established the PPP as a new 7(a) loan option overseen by the Treasury Department and backed by the SBA [Small Business Administration], which is authorized to provide a 100% guarantee to lenders on loans issued under the program. The full principal amount of the loans may qualify for loan forgiveness if the borrower maintains or rehires staff and maintains compensation levels. However, not more than 25% of the loan forgiveness amount may be attributable to nonpayroll costs. Independent contractors and self-employed individuals can apply for PPP loans beginning April 10. Under the PPP, the maximum loan amount is the lesser of $10 million or an amount calculated using a payroll-based formula specified in the CARES Act. Note: You can access free loan calculators on the AICPA’s PPP resource page.” (See the SBA Paycheck Protection Program.)

Most payroll service providers can provide the payroll documentation needed for this program. 

You may only include payroll to employees in the monthly payroll tax base; the SBA does not allow independent contractors in the calculation. (See https://home.treasury.gov/system/files/136/PPP–Fact-Sheet.pdf and https://taxfoundation.org/sba-paycheck-protection-program-cares-act/)

Most TTS sole proprietors and TTS partnerships don’t hire outside employees. The IRS doesn’t permit sole proprietors or partnerships to pay salaries to owners. Therefore, most TTS sole proprietors and partnerships don’t have a monthly payroll cost required for an SBA PPP loan application. TTS S-Corps might pay officer compensation to the owner, usually in Q4, when there is the transparency of trading profits for the year.

However, the SBA likely considers a TTS trading business to be a “speculative business,” which is not eligible for an SBA loan. The list of speculative businesses includes “dealing in stocks, bonds, commodity futures, and other financial instruments.” (See SBA SOP 50 10 5(B).)

Recovery rebates
Taxpayers under a threshold for adjusted gross income (AGI) are eligible for an advance tax refund of a 2020 tax credit. There’s a reduction of the payment in a phase-out range above the threshold. So the IRS can pay the direct deposit to a taxpayer’s bank account or mail a check faster, it looks to the taxpayer’s 2018 or 2019 tax return filing. (For social security recipients who don’t file a tax return, the IRS looks at their SSA Form 1099.) Treasury promised to provide a Website to enter direct deposit information if the prior-year tax return did not provide that information.

Retirement plan distributions
Taxpayers negatively impacted by COVID-19 can take a withdrawal from an IRA or qualified retirement plan of up to a maximum of $100,000 in 2020 and be exempt from the 10% excise tax on “early withdrawals.” The taxpayer has the option of returning (rolling over) the funds within three years or paying income taxes on the 2020 distribution over three years. CARES also suspended required minimum distributions for 2020. (Update May 4, 2020: IRS Website Coronavirus-related relief for retirement plans and IRAs questions and answers.)

Net operating losses
The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act repealed NOL carrybacks and applied NOL carryforwards up to 80% of the following year’s taxable income, but CARES temporarily suspended this. It allows five-year carrybacks for NOLs in 2018, 2019, and 2020 and/or 100% application of NOL carryforwards against subsequent year’s taxable income.

Traders should consider getting started on 2018 and 2019 NOL carrybacks for quick tax refunds right away.

Section 475 traders generate ordinary losses, which comprises NOLs, whereas capital losses do not contribute to NOLs. CARES does not allow taxpayers to file a retroactive 475 election for 2018 and 2019. On April 9, 2020, the IRS postponed the 2020 Section 475 election deadline for individuals from April 15 to July 15, 2020. (See live updates on CARES Act Allows 5-Year NOL Carrybacks For Immediate Tax Refunds and Massive Market Losses? Elect 475 For Enormous Tax Savings.)

Excess business losses
CARES suspended TCJA’s excess business loss (EBL) limitation for 2018, 2019, and 2020. That change might lead to a reduction of tax liability in those years and also increase NOL carrybacks. The EBL threshold for 2018 was $500,000 for married and $250,000 for other taxpayers. Amounts over the EBL limitation were NOL carryforwards under TCJA.

CARES is new legislation, and tax professionals have many questions that the Treasury Department and the IRS will likely answer soon. Stay tuned to our blog post to see how CARES and related virus legislation impacts TTS traders. Also, see CARES Act tax provisions aim to stabilize pandemic-ravaged economy.

If you need our help with CARES tax relief, contact us soon. For CARES payroll-related aid, contact your payroll service provider. For unemployment insurance benefits, contact your state unemployment insurance office.

CPAs Darren Neuschwander and Adam Manning contributed to this blog post.


A Rationale For Using QBI Tax Treatment For Traders

June 4, 2019 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

There are two opposing arguments made by tax professionals for applying Section 199A qualified business income (QBI) treatment on 2018 tax returns for traders with trader tax status (TTS).

Those for say Section 199A applies because Section 864(b)(2) is limited to nonresident traders only. U.S. resident TTS traders meet the requirements of Section 864(c)(3) “Other income from sources within United States.” As a result, a U.S. resident TTS trader has effectively connected income (ECI) and therefore, QBI. In this blog post, I refer to this stance as the affirmative or positive rationale.

Those against say Section 199A does not apply to U.S. resident TTS traders because Section 864(b)(2) applies to all traders. This scenario means that “trading for taxpayer’s own account” does not constitute ECI and therefore, QBI does not apply. In this blog post, I refer to this stance as the contrary or negative argument.

Here is what we know. Section 199A labeled TTS trading a “specified service trade or business” (SSTB). The contrary argument would lead to conflict: Why would 199A recognize TTS trading as an SSTB, if 864(b)(2) denied a QBI deduction to U.S. resident TTS traders? With the positive rationale, QBI includes TTS trading business expenses and Section 475 ordinary income/loss. QBI expressly excludes capital gains/losses, interest and dividend income, and forex and swap contract ordinary income/loss. A taxable income threshold, phase-in range, and income cap apply to SSTBs, which leads to some high-income taxpayers not receiving a 20% QBI deduction. (The QBI deduction rules are complex and beyond the scope of this blog post.)

Many traders filed 2018 tax extensions on March 15 (entities) and April 15 (individuals). Their tax preparers are waiting to resolve uncertainty over this issue before the tax return deadlines of Sept. 16, 2019, for partnerships and S-Corps and Oct. 15, 2019, for individual sole proprietorships.

A positive rationale to apply 199A to U.S. resident TTS traders
If you search the 199A final regs, you will find mention of 864(c) beneath the heading “Interaction of Sections 875(1) and 199A.” Section 875(1) states “a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation shall be considered as being engaged in a trade or business within the United States if the partnership of which such individual or corporation is a member is so engaged.”

199A regs state, “Section 199A(c)(3)(A)(i) provides that for purposes of determining QBI, the term qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss means items of income, gain, deduction and loss to the extent such items are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States (within the meaning of section 864(c), determined by substituting ‘qualified trade or business (within the meaning of section 199A’ for ‘nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation’ or for ‘a foreign corporation’ each place it appears).”

A U.S. resident TTS trader meets the definition of Section 864(c)(3) “Other income from sources within United States.”

“All income, gain, or loss from sources within the United States (other than income, gain, or loss to which paragraph (2) applies) shall be treated as effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States.”

A U.S. resident TTS trader has Section 162 trade or business expenses. It’s consistent with 199A stating a TTS trading activity is an SSTB.

A U.S. resident TTS trader also meets the definition of 864(c)(2) “Periodical, etc., income from sources within United States—factors.”

“In determining whether income from sources within the United States of the types described in section 871(a)(1), section 871(h) , section 881(a), or section 881(c), or whether gain or loss from sources within the United States from the sale or exchange of capital assets, is effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States, the factors taken into account shall include whether—

(A) The income, gain, or loss is derived from assets used in or held for use in the conduct of such trade or business, or

(B) The activities of such trade or business were a material factor in the realization of the income, gain, or loss. In determining whether an asset is used in or held for use in the conduct of such trade or business or whether the activities of such trade or business were a material factor in realizing an item of income, gain, or loss, due regard shall be given to whether or not such asset or such income, gain, or loss was accounted for through such trade or business.”

A U.S. resident TTS trading business uses the capital for the sale of capital assets to derive its income, and money is a material factor.

Section 871(a)(2) provides that a nonresident individual residing in the U.S. for more than 183 days per year is subject to a 30% tax on U.S.-source capital gains. (A tax treaty may provide relief.)

Some accountants think that Section 864(b)(2) prevents all traders, U.S. residents, and nonresidents, from using QBI treatment.

“Section 864(b) – the term a “trade or business within the U.S.” does not include:

Section 864(b)(1) – Performance of personal services for foreign employer.

Section 864(b)(2) – Trading in securities or commodities.

(A): Stocks and securities.
(i)   In general. Trading in stocks or securities through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian, or other independent agent.
(ii)   Trading for taxpayer’s own account. Trading in stocks or securities for the taxpayer’s own account, whether by the taxpayer or his employees or through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian, or other agent, and whether or not any such employee or agent has discretionary authority to make decisions in effecting the transactions. This clause shall not apply in the case of a dealer in stocks or securities.
(C) Limitation. Subparagraphs (A)(i) and (B)(i) (for commodities) shall apply only if, at no time during the taxable year, the taxpayer has an office or other fixed place of business in the United States through which or by the direction of which the transactions in stocks or securities, or in commodities, as the case may be, are effected.”

The (C) Limitation relates to (i) nonresident investors engaging a U.S. broker. This exception applies if the nonresident does not have an office in the U.S. The exemption does not apply to (ii) “trading for taxpayer’s own account.”

In the 1.864-2 reg, there are several examples under “trading for taxpayer’s own account,” and all of the cases are for nonresident individuals and nonresident partnerships. If you read 864(b)(2)(A)(ii) as applying to nonresidents only, then it supports the affirmative rationale for using 199A on U.S. resident TTS traders.

Reg § 1.864-2(a) states:

“(a) In general. As used in part I (section 861 and following) and part II (section 871 and following), subchapter N, chapter 1 of the Code, and chapter 3 (section 1441 and following) of the Code, and the regulations thereunder, the term “engaged in trade or business within the United States” does not include the activities described in paragraphs (c) (trading in stocks or securities) and (d) (trading in commodities) of this section, but includes the performance of personal services within the United States at any time within the taxable year except to the extent otherwise provided in this section.”

The code sections in this heading are all for nonresidents:
861 – Income from sources within the United States
871 – Tax on nonresident alien individuals
Subchapter N – Tax based on income from sources within or without the United States
Chapter 3 – Withholding of tax on nonresident aliens and foreign corporations
1441: Withholding and reporting requirements for payments to a foreign person

Reg § 1.864-2(c) is for “trading in stocks or securities,” and (d) is for “trading in commodities.” Those sections discuss nonresident individuals and nonresident partnerships with U.S. brokerage accounts and explain that no matter how significant the volume of trades, that a nonresident trader does not have ECI in the U.S. This reg displays several examples, and all of them are for nonresidents. Again, this reg and related code Section 864(b)(2) is for nonresident traders only. A U.S. resident TTS trader is covered in Section 864(c), not in Section 864(b)(2).

The essential point is that the 199A regs do not state to “substitute qualified trade or business for nonresident or foreign” in Section 864(b) – so that code section remains applicable to nonresident traders only. The 199A regs required this substitution for 864(c) only.

Tax attorney Johnny Lyle J.D. weighs in:

“To read IRC Section 864(b) into the equation, you have to determine that the language ‘In the case of a qualified trade or business (within the meaning of section 199A) engaged in trade or business within the United States during the taxable year…’ requires you to determine ‘qualified trade or business under Section 199A,’ but then turn around and determine ‘trade or business within the United States’ under IRC Section 864(b),” Lyle said.

Further, Treasury Regulation Section 1.864-4, titled “U.S. source income effectively connected with U.S. business” states: “This section applies only to a nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation that is engaged in a trade or business in the United States at some time during a taxable year beginning after December 31, 1966, and to the income, gain, or loss of such person from sources within the United States.”

Treasury Regulation Section 1.864-2, titled “Trade or business within the United States” uses only nonresident aliens and foreign corporations in its examples.

Lyle said two arguments could be made regarding Congress using the language specifically referencing IRC Section 864(c) in IRC Section 199A. First, if Congress wanted to incorporate Section 864(b) into the equation, it would have said effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States (within the meaning of section 864) without reference to 864(c). Second, under the Treasury Regulations, 864(b) only applies to nonresident aliens. Therefore, the restriction in 864(b)(2)(A)(ii) would only apply to nonresident aliens, and a taxpayer who was a day trader, but not a nonresident alien, would not be excluded from ECI.

“If Congress intended to exclude all trader income, it would have done so under IRC Section 199A(c)(3)(B) rather than a more roundabout, back door way, rendering IRC Section 199A(d)(2)(B) meaningless,” Lyle said. “If Congress wanted to specifically incorporate Section 864(b), it would have worded it this way: …effectively connected (within the meaning of section 864(c)) with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States (within the meaning of section 864(b)), determined by substituting ‘qualified trade or business (within the meaning of section 199A)’ for ‘nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation’ or for ‘a foreign corporation’ each place it appears.”

It gives me some pause that some big-four accountants prepared a few 2018 hedge fund partnership K-1s without applying 199A tax treatment. Their K-1 notes indicated reliance on Sections 864(c) and or 864(b) to skip the application of 199A. When we asked some big-four tax partners for clarification, they said they were not wedded to that position. Did these accountants take an easy way out, by reading Section 864(b)(2) out of context? The hedge fund investors would have been hurt with QBI treatment since they would have QBI losses from TTS trading business expenses. The hedge fund had capital gains, which QBI excludes. The hedge fund did not elect Section 475 ordinary income or loss, which QBI includes.

On the other side of the debate, I’ve seen some K-1s from proprietary trading firms, and all of those K-1s did report 199A information. They reported QBI income since they elected Section 475 on securities. I asked their tax preparers about it, and they said 864(b)(2) applies to foreign partnerships, not these U.S. trading partnerships.

I spoke with a tax attorney in IRS Office of Chief Counsel listed on the Section 199A regs, and he thought the positive rationale makes sense. He even accommodated my request to add Section 475 by name to inclusion in QBI in the final 199A regs. The IRS attorney did not raise Section 864(c) or 864(b)(2) as being a problem for U.S. resident TTS traders.

It’s time to complete 2018 tax returns even with remaining uncertainty. I suggest that U.S. resident TTS traders, living, working, and trading in the U.S. consider applying 199A to their trading business. Consult your tax advisor.

CPAs Darren Neuschwander and Adam Manning, and tax attorney Johnny Lyle contributed to this blog post.

See my prior blog posts on 199A for traders at https://greentradertax.com/uncertainty-about-using-qbi-tax-treatment-for-traders/


Uncertainty About Using QBI Tax Treatment For Traders

March 6, 2019 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

See our more recent blog post: A Rationale For Using QBI Tax Treatment For Traders.

Traders in securities and/or commodities, qualifying for trader tax status (TTS) as a sole proprietor, S-Corp, or partnership (including hedge funds), are wondering if they should use “qualified business income” (QBI) tax treatment on their 2018 tax returns. I see a rationale to include such treatment, but there are conflicts and unresolved questions, which renders it uncertain at this time. Section 199A QBI regs include “trading” as a “specified service trade or business” (SSTB), and QBI counts Section 475 ordinary income or loss. However, Section 199A’s interaction with 864(c) may override that and deny QBI tax treatment to U.S. resident traders.

QBI treatment might be an issue for all TTS traders, not just the ones who elected Section 475 ordinary income or loss. For example, a TTS sole proprietor trader filing a Schedule C would report business expenses as a QBI loss, which might reduce aggregate QBI from other activities, thereby reducing an overall QBI deduction. There are QBI loss carryovers, too.

Many TTS traders and hedge funds don’t want QBI tax treatment since they have not elected Section 475, and QBI excludes capital gains, Section 988 forex ordinary income, dividends, and interest income. Hedge fund accountants seem to prefer the Section 864 rationale to not use QBI treatment for TTS funds.

A partnership or S-Corp needs to report QBI items on Schedule K-1 lines for “Other Information,” in box 20 for partnerships and box 17 for S-Corps, including Section 199A income or loss, and related 199A factors like W-2 wages and qualified property.

With uncertainty over QBI tax treatment, traders should file 2018 tax extensions for partnerships and S-Corps by March 15, 2019, and extensions for individuals by April 15, 2019.

A 2019 Section 475 election is due by those extension deadlines. Section 475 gives tax loss insurance: Exemption on wash sale loss adjustments on securities and avoidance of the $3,000 capital loss limitation. There’s a chance traders might be entitled to a QBI deduction on 475 income, so factor that possibility into decision making. (See my recent blog on extensions and 475 elections.)

Section 864 might deny QBI treatment to TTS traders
I took a closer look at the confusing language in Section 199A’s interaction with Section 864(c), which might deny QBI treatment to TTS traders. Section 199A final regs imply that if a trade or business does not constitute “effectively connected income” (ECI) in the hands of a non-resident alien under Section 864(c), then it’s not QBI for a U.S. resident taxpayer operating a domestic trade or business.

Historically, Section 864 applied to nonresident aliens, and foreign entities for determining U.S. source income, including ECI in Section 864(c). Reading Section 864 makes sense with nonresident aliens in mind. However, it gets confusing when 199A overlays language on top of Section 864 for the benefit of determining QBI for U.S. residents.

The function of Section 864 is to show nonresident aliens how to distinguish between U.S.-source income (effectively connected income) vs. foreign-source income. An essential element of Section 199A is to limit a QBI deduction to “domestic trades or businesses,” not foreign ones. 199A also uses the term “qualified trades or business.” It appears the authors of 199A used a modified Section 864 for determining “domestic QBI.”

Section 864 a “trade or business within the U.S.” does not include:
“Section 864(b) — Trade or business within the United States.

Section 864(b)(2) — Trading in securities or commodities.

(A): Stocks and securities.

(i)    In general. Trading in stocks or securities through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian, or other independent agent.

(ii)    Trading for taxpayer’s own account. Trading in stocks or securities for the taxpayer’s own account, whether by the taxpayer or his employees or through a resident broker, commission agent, custodian, or other agent, and whether or not any such employee or agent has discretionary authority to make decisions in effecting the transactions. This clause shall not apply in the case of a dealer in stocks or securities.

(C) Limitation. Subparagraphs (A)(i) and (B)(i) (for commodities) shall apply only if, at no time during the taxable year, the taxpayer has an office or other fixed place of business in the United States through which or by the direction of which the transactions in stocks or securities, or in commodities, as the case may be, are effected.”

Example of (ii) above: A nonresident alien “trades his own account” at a U.S. brokerage firm. The nonresident does not have an office in the U.S., but it doesn’t matter since the 864(b)(2)(C) limitation does not apply to (ii), a trader for his account, it only applies to (i). Although this trader might qualify for TTS, he does not have a “trade or business within the U.S.” and therefore does not have QBI as a nonresident alien.

Notice how Section 199A regs reference Section 864:

“Section 199A(c)(3)(A)(i) provides that for purposes of determining QBI, the term qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss means items of income, gain, deduction and loss to the extent such items are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business within the United States (within the meaning of section 864(c), determined by substituting ‘qualified trade or business (within the meaning of section 199A’ for ‘nonresident alien individual or a foreign corporation’ or for ‘a foreign corporation’ each place it appears).”

According to tax publisher Checkpoint, “Effectively connected income-qualified business income defined for purposes of the 2018-2025 pass-through deduction.”

“Income derived from excluded services under Code Sec. 864(b)(1) (performance of personal services for foreign employer, or Code Sec. 864(b)(2) (trading in securities or commodities) can never be effectively connected income in the hands of a nonresident alien.

Code Sec. 864(b)(2) generally treats foreign persons, including partnerships, who are trading in stocks, securities, and in commodities for their own account or through a broker or other independent agent as not engaged in a U.S. trade or business. So, if a trade or business isn’t engaged in a U.S. trade or business by reason of Code Sec. 864(b), items of income, gain, deduction, or loss from that trade or business won’t be included in QBI because those items wouldn’t be effectively connected with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business.”

In 199A, the first reference to Section 864 is under the heading “Interaction of Sections 875(1) and 199A.”

“Section 875(1) Partnerships; beneficiaries of estates and trusts: (i) a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation shall be considered as being engaged in a trade or business within the United States if the partnership of which such individual or corporation is a member is so engaged, and (ii) a nonresident alien individual or foreign corporation which is a beneficiary of an estate or trust which is engaged in any trade or business within the United States shall be treated as being engaged in such trade or business within the United States.”

An example of Section 875(1): Consider a U.S. partnership in the consulting business. U.S. residents and nonresident alien investors own it. The Schedule K-1 for partners reports ordinary income on line 1, which according to Section 875(1) is ECI for the nonresident partners. The nonresident alien must file a Form 1040NR to report this ECI, and she might be eligible for a QBI deduction since it’s from a “domestic trade or business,” determined on the entity level.

Conflicts and unresolved questions
Tax writers in 199A regs left conflicts and unresolved questions when it comes to traders in securities and or commodities. Are traders in no man’s land? I’ve asked several of the tax attorneys in IRS Office of Chief Counsel listed in the 199A regs to answer the following question: Are U.S. resident traders in securities and or commodities with trader tax status subject to QBI tax treatment? I am awaiting an answer.

The 199A regs state:

“The trade or business of the performance of services that consist of investing and investment management, trading, or dealing in securities (as defined in section 475(c)(2))…

(xii) Meaning of the provision of services in trading. For purposes of section 199A(d)(2) and paragraph (b)(1)(xi) of this section only, the performance of services that consist of trading means a trade or business of trading in securities (as defined in section 475(c)(2)), commodities (as defined in section 475(e)(2)), or partnership interests. Whether a person is a trader in securities, commodities, or partnership interests is determined by taking into account all relevant facts and circumstances, including the source and type of profit that is associated with engaging in the activity regardless of whether that person trades for the person’s own account, for the account of others, or any combination thereof.”

Section 199A regs define “trading” as a “specified service trade or business” (SSTB). The regs focus on “performance of services,” which relates to a proprietary trader performing trading services to a prop trading firm and issued a 1099-Misc as an independent contractor. Some tax advisors had suggested that hedge funds don’t perform trading services; their management companies do. That may be why tax writers added “trading for your own account.”

The million-dollar question is “Why define TTS trading as an SSTB unless the tax writers intended QBI treatment for that SSTB?

Only a Section 475 election can generate QBI income for a trading SSTB (or QBI losses, if incurred). The 199A final regs added Section 475 to QBI. This combination of SSTB and 475 income would make a trader eligible for a QBI deduction. Others could argue 475 was added only for dealers in securities and or commodities.

The 199A regs indicate if a trade or business does not constitute “effectively connected income” (ECI) in the hands of a nonresident alien under Section 864(c), then it’s not QBI for a U.S. resident taxpayer, even if operating a domestic trade or business. Is there a loophole in that “trader in securities or commodities” are covered under Section 864(b)(2), not 864(c)?

My partner Darren Neuschwander CPA, and I communicated with leading CPAs, including two big-four tax partners. Those tax partners acknowledged conflicts and uncertainties in QBI treatment for hedge funds and solo TTS traders. The vast majority of larger hedge funds don’t elect Section 475, so those hedge funds would only experience the downside to QBI treatment — QBI losses for investors.

The tax attorneys who drafted TCJA and199A regs may have intended to exclude TTS trading companies including hedge funds from QBI tax treatment because they figured these companies would most likely have QBI losses caused by TTS business expenses. They knew QBI excluded most portfolio income like capital gains, dividends, and interest income so that traders might consider the law unfair. I advocated for TTS trades to have QBI treatment because many solo TTS traders have elected Section 475 and they would get a QBI deduction.

TTS and 475 elections help traders
No matter which way the pendulum swings on QBI treatment for traders, I still recommend trader tax status for deducting business expenses, and a TTS S-Corp for health insurance and retirement plan deductions. There are always the tax loss insurance benefits in Section 475. (See Traders Elect Section 475 For Massive Tax Savings.)

Darren L. Neuschwander CPA, and Roger Lorence JD contributed to this blog post.


IRS Confirms Section 475 Is Eligible For QBI Tax Deduction

January 21, 2019 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

Good news for traders: Section 199A final regs confirm QBI includes Section 475 ordinary income and loss.

On Jan. 18, 2019, the IRS issued final 199A regs for the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) 20% qualified business income (QBI) deduction. The final regs update the August 2018 proposed/reliance 199A regs and confirm that QBI includes Section 475 ordinary income/loss.

Based on our interpretation of TCJA and the proposed/reliance regs, we figured QBI included Section 475 ordinary income/loss, but it was uncertain. Our previous content stated that QBI “likely” included Section 475 ordinary income/loss. The final and proposed/reliance regs each state that QBI expressly excludes capital gains and losses, and also excludes Section 954 items of ordinary income, including forex Section 988 and notional principal contracts.

Making our case to the IRS
After noticing that the proposed/reliance regs were silent about Section 475 income/loss, I contacted one of the lawyers at the Office of Chief Counsel listed on the 199A proposed regs.

The attorney called me back after he saw my interview in Tax Notes, “Groups Urge IRS to Rethink 199A Business Income Rules.” I presented our firm’s rationale for including Section 475 ordinary income/loss in QBI for TTS traders and suggested he read and watch our content. The IRS attorney said my rationale sounded “plausible” in his opinion.

Excerpts from final regs
Final 199A regs, p. 55-56:

“Given the specific reference to section 1231 gain in the proposed regulations, other commenters requested guidance with respect to whether gain or loss under other provisions of the Code would be included in QBI. One commenter asked for clarification about whether real estate gain, which is taxed at a preferential rate, is included in QBI. Additionally, other commenters requested clarification regarding whether items treated as ordinary income, such as gain under sections 475, 1245, and 1250, are included in QBI.

To avoid any unintended inferences, the final regulations remove the specific reference to section 1231 and provide that any item of short-term capital gain, short-term capital loss, long-term capital gain, or long-term capital loss, including any item treated as one of such items under any other provision of the Code, is not taken into account as a qualified item of income, gain, deduction, or loss. To the extent an item is not treated as an item of capital gain or capital loss under any other provision of the Code, it is taken into account as a qualified item of income, gain, deduction, or loss unless otherwise excluded by section 199A or these regulations.

Similarly, another commenter requested clarification regarding whether income from foreign currencies and notional principal contracts are excluded from QBI if they are ordinary income. Section 199A(c)(3)(B)(iv) and §1.199A-3(b)(3)(D) provide that any item of gain or loss described in section 954(c)(1)(C) (transactions in commodities) or section 954(c)(1)(D) (excess foreign currency gains) is not included as a qualified item of income, gain, deduction, or loss. Section 199A(c)(3)(B)(v) and §1.199A-3(b)(3)(E) provide any item of income, gain, deduction, or loss described in section 954(c)(1)(F) (income from notional principal contracts) determined without regard to section 954(c)(1)(F)(ii) and other than items attributable to notional principal contracts entered into in transactions qualifying under section 1221(a)(7) is not included as a qualified item of income, gain, deduction, or loss. The statutory language does not provide for the ability to permit an exception to these rules based on the character of the income. Accordingly, income from foreign currencies and notional principal contracts described in the listed sections is excluded from QBI, regardless of whether it is ordinary income.”

Parsing the language in the final 199A regs
In the proposed 199A regs, QBI excluded all capital gains and losses, and ordinary income/loss items expressly listed in Section 954. Section 954 does not include Section 475 ordinary income/loss. In the proposed regs, QBI expressly included Section 1231 losses from the sale of business property, whereas, QBI excluded Section 1231 capital gains. Section 475 ordinary income/loss is similar to Section 1231 ordinary losses, and it’s not in Section 954, so we determined that QBI likely included Section 475 ordinary income/loss.

The final 199A regs acknowledge the uncertainty and tax writers fixed it in the above language. They opened the door for Section 1231 losses to include more items like Section 475 ordinary income/loss, reiterating that it must not be on the Section 954 list, which Section 475 is not.

There’s an important caveat
Section 199A interacts with a modified Section 864(c), and Section 864 might deny QBI treatment to TTS traders and hedge funds. On the one hand, there is a rationale for QBI treatment for TTS traders, as expressed in this blog post, and Section 864 conflicts with that case. There are unresolved questions which I expect to write a blog post about it soon. Considering conflicts with Section 864, I think QBI treatment for traders is uncertain at this time.

How QBI might work for a TTS trading business
The proposed and final 199A regs state that traders eligible for trader tax status are a “specified service trade or business” (SSTB), so the SSTB taxable income (TI) cap applies. Taxpayers who make one dollar over the TI cap will not be allowed a QBI deduction on SSTB QBI. On the other hand, non-SSTB activity is not restricted to the TI cap, although the W-2 wage and property limitations apply over the TI threshold.

For 2018, the SSTB TI cap is $415,000/$207,500 (married/other taxpayers). The phase-out range below the cap is $100,000/$50,000 (married/other taxpayers), in which the QBI deduction phases out for an SSTB. The 50% W-2 wage and property basis limitations also apply within the phase-out range. For 2018, the TI threshold is $315,000/$157,500 (married/other taxpayers): If a taxpayer is below the TI threshold, there are no phase-out, wage or property limitations for SSTB and non-SSTB.

For 2019, the SSTB TI cap increases to $421,400/$210,700 (married/other taxpayers) based on the inflation adjustment. The phase-out range remains the same, so for 2019, the TI threshold is $321,400/$160,700 (married/other taxpayers).

Hedge funds with TTS and Section 475 ordinary income/loss should report QBI, too. Investors in these hedge funds are eligible for a QBI deduction if they are under the TI cap. Even without a 475 election, trading SSTB has QBI losses from trading expenses.

Investment managers are also SSTB, and they have QBI from advisory fees. Carried interest as a profit allocation of Section 475 ordinary income/loss is QBI, too. Carried interest in capital gains is not.

It’s more crucial to qualify for TTS than ever before
TTS allows business expense treatment, whereas, TCJA suspended “certain miscellaneous itemized deductions subject to the 2% floor,” which includes investment fees and investment expenses. TCJA still allows investors itemized deductions for investment-interest expenses limited to investment income, and stock borrow fees as other itemized deductions. TTS business expenses allow a long list of deductions from gross income, including home office, and that’s far better!

TTS traders may elect Section 475 mark-to-market (MTM) accounting on securities and or commodities (Section 1256 contracts). Securities traders appreciate that Section 475 trades are exempt from dreaded wash-sale loss adjustments and the $3,000 capital loss limitation. I call it “tax loss insurance,” because 475 ordinary losses lead to much faster tax refunds. (TCJA did repeal NOL carrybacks, forcing NOL carryforwards, instead.) TTS traders are entitled to segregate investment positions to achieve lower tax rates on long-term capital gains. TTS traders prefer to skip Section 475 on commodities to retain lower 60/40 capital gains rates on Section 1256 contracts.

Now with final 199A regs, there’s still uncertainty for QBI treatment for TTS traders. Profitable TTS traders might want to consider a Section 475 election to be perhaps eligible for a potential QBI deduction. In some years, the trader might be under the TI cap, allowing a QBI deduction, and in other years, he might have a (good) problem of exceeding the cap for no QBI deduction.

Married taxpayers should consider filing separately, as that might unlock a QBI deduction for one spouse since the other spouse might have income exceeding the SSA income cap. TCJA equalized the tax rates for filing jointly vs. separately.

TTS traders with Section 475 ordinary losses might be unhappy. For example, assume a trader has $100,000 of QBI from a consulting business. She also has TTS/Section 475 ordinary losses of $40,000, so her aggregate QBI is $60,000, which reduces the QBI deduction.

Section 199A regs are complicated
There are complex issues over what constitutes an SSTB vs. non-SSTB, how to calculate the W-2 wage and property limitations, definitions of QBI, and more.

Taxpayers have to calculate the QBI deduction on whichever is lower: aggregate QBI or taxable income minus net capital gains/losses.

If you expect to receive a 2018 Schedule K-1 containing QBI tax information, then consider filing an automatic extension by April 15. I assume that many pass-through entities won’t issue final 2018 Schedule K-1s until after that date. It’s great that the IRS issued the final 199A regs now, but there are still conflicts and unresolved questions. Look for QBI items on partnership Schedule K-1 line 20 “Other Information” marked with various codes for 199A items of income, wages, property and more. See the K-1 instructions for line 20.

Elect Section 475 on time
Individual TTS traders need to file a 2019 Section 475 election statement with the IRS by April 15, 2019. Existing partnerships and S-Corps need to file a 2019 Section 475 election statement with the IRS by March 15, 2019. New taxpayers (i.e., new entities) may elect Section 475 within 75 days of inception by internal election. Existing taxpayers have a second step to file a Form 3115 with their 2019 tax return.

Learn more about TTS, Section 475, QBI and entity solutions in Green’s 2019 Trader Tax Guide.

Darren L. Neuschwander, CPA contributed to this blog post.

I revised this blog post on March 5, 2019, in conjunction with my new blog post Uncertainty About Using QBI Tax Treatment For Traders


New Tax Law Favors Hedge Funds Over Managed Accounts

August 28, 2018 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

Hedge fund investors benefited from tax advantages over separately managed accounts (SMA) for many years. The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) widened the difference by suspending all miscellaneous itemized deductions, including investment fees. SMA investors are out of luck, but hedge fund investors can limit the negative impact using carried-interest tax breaks. TCJA provided a new 20% deduction on qualified business income, which certain hedge fund investors might be eligible for if they are under income caps for a service business.

TCJA penalizes investors with separately managed accounts
SMA investors cannot claim trader tax status (TTS) since an outside manager conducts the trading, not the investor. Therefore, investment expense treatment applies for advisory fees paid.

Beginning in 2018, TCJA suspended all miscellaneous itemized deductions for individuals, which includes investment fees and expenses. If a manager charges a 2% management fee and a 20% incentive fee, an individual may no longer deduct those investment fees for income tax purposes. Before 2018, the IRS allowed miscellaneous itemized deductions greater than 2% of AGI, but no deduction was allowed for alternative minimum tax (AMT); plus, there was a Pease itemized deduction limitation. (Taxpayers are still entitled to deduct investment fees and expenses for calculating net investment income for the Net Investment Tax.)

For example: Assume an SMA investor has net capital gains of $110,000 in 2018. Advisory fees are $30,000, comprised of $10,000 in management fees and $20,000 in incentive fees. Net cash flow on the SMA for the investor is $80,000 ($110,000 income minus $30,000 fees). The SMA investor owes income tax on $110,000 since TCJA suspended the miscellaneous itemized deduction for investment fees and expenses. If the individual’s federal and state marginal tax rates are 40%, the tax hike might be as high as $12,000 ($30,000 x 40%). (See Investment Fees Are Not Deductible But Borrow Fees Are.)

Investment managers do okay with SMAs
In the previous example, the investment manager reports service business revenues of $30,000. Net income after deducting business expenses is subject to ordinary tax rates.

An investment manager for an SMA is not eligible for a carried-interest share in long-term capital gains, or 60/40 rates on Section 1256 contracts, which have lower tax rates vs. ordinary income. Only hedge fund managers as owners of the investment fund may receive carried interest, a profit allocation of capital gains and portfolio income.

Additionally, if the manager is an LLC filing a partnership tax return, net income is considered self-employment income subject to SE taxes (FICA and Medicare). If the LLC has S-Corp treatment, it should have a reasonable compensation, which is subject to payroll tax (FICA and Medicare).

Hedge funds provide tax advantages to investors
Carried interest helps investors and investment managers. Rather than charge an incentive fee, the investment manager, acting as a partner in the hedge fund, is paid a special allocation (“profit allocation”) of capital gains, Section 475 ordinary income, and other income.

Let’s turn the earlier example into a hedge fund scenario. The hedge fund initially allocates net capital gains of $110,000, and $10,000 of management fees to the investor on a preliminary Schedule K-1. Next, a profit allocation clause carves out 20% of capital gains ($20,000) from the investor’s K-1 and credits it to the investment manager’s K-1. The final investor K-1 has $90,000 of capital gains and an investment expense of $10,000, which is suspended as an itemized deduction on the investor’s individual tax return. Carried interest helps the investor by turning a non-deductible incentive fee of $20,000 into a reduced capital gain of $20,000. Carried interest is imperative for investors in a hedge fund that is not eligible for TTS business expense treatment. With a 40% federal and state tax rate, the tax savings on using the profit allocation instead of an incentive fee is $8,000 ($20,000 x 40%). To improve tax savings for investors, hedge fund managers might reduce management fees and increase incentive allocations.

TCJA modified carried interest rules for managers
Hedge fund managers must now hold an underlying position in the fund for three tax years to benefit from long-term capital gains allocated through profit allocation (carried interest). The regular holding period for long-term capital gains is one year. I’m glad Congress did not outright repeal carried interest, as that would have unduly penalized investors. The rule change trims the benefits for managers and safeguards the benefits for investors. The three-year holding period does not relate to Section 1256 contracts with lower 60/40 capital gains rates, where 60% is a long-term capital gain, and 40% is short-term.

Trader tax status and Section 475 tax advantages
If a hedge fund qualifies for TTS, then it allocates deductible business expenses to investors, not suspended investment expenses. I expect many hedge funds will still use a profit allocation clause since it might bring tax advantages to the investment manager — a share of long-term capital gains, and a reduction of payroll taxes on earned income vs. not owing payroll taxes on short-term capital gains.

TCJA 20% QBI deduction on pass-through entities
The TCJA included a lucrative new tax cut for pass-through entities. An individual taxpayer may deduct whichever is lower: either 20% of qualified business income (QBI) from pass-through entities or 20% of their taxable income minus net capital gains, subject to other limitations, too. (Other QBI includes qualified real estate investment trust REIT dividends and qualified publicly traded partnership PTP income.)

The proposed QBI regulations confirm that traders eligible for TTS are considered a service business (SSTB). Upper-income SSTB owners won’t get a deduction on QBI if their taxable income (TI) exceeds the income cap of $415,000/$207,500 (married/other taxpayers). The phase-out range is $100,000/$50,000 (married/other taxpayers) below the income cap, in which the QBI deduction phases out for SSTBs. The W-2 wage and property basis limitations apply within the phase-out range, too.

Hedge funds with TTS are an SSTB if the fund is trading for its account through an investment manager partner. A hedge fund with TTS is entitled to elect Section 475 ordinary income or loss. Hedge fund QBI likely includes Section 475 ordinary income. QBI excludes all capital gains, commodities and forex transactions, dividends, and interest. The SSTB taxable income thresholds and cap apply to each investor in the hedge fund; some may get a QBI deduction, whereas, others may not, depending on their TI, QBI aggregation, and more. (See How Traders Can Get 20% QBI Deduction Under IRS Proposed Regulations.)

The proposed QBI regulations also describe investing and investment management as an SSTB. QBI includes advisory fee revenues for investment managers earned from U.S. clients, but not foreign clients. QBI must be from domestic sources. I presume QBI should exclude a carried-interest share (profit allocation) of capital gains but will include a carried-interest percentage of Section 475 ordinary income.

TCJA might impact the investment management industry
Many investors are upset about losing a tax deduction for investment fees and expenses. Some just realized it. I recently received an email from an investor complaining to me about TCJA’s suspension of investment fees and expenses. He was about to sign an agreement with an investment manager for an SMA but scrapped the deal after learning he could not deduct investment fees. Most hedge funds only work with larger accounts and adhere to rules for accredited investors and qualified clients who can pay performance fees or profit allocations.

Larger family offices may have a workaround for using business expense treatment without TTS, as I address on my blog post How To Avoid IRS Challenge On Your Family Office.

Managed accounts vs. hedge fund
Investment managers handle two types of investors: separately managed accounts (SMAs) and hedge funds (or commodity or forex pools). In an SMA, the client maintains a retail customer account, granting trading power to the investment manager. In a hedge fund, the investor pools his money for an equity interest in the fund, receiving an annual Schedule K-1 for his allocation of income and expense. It’s different with offshore hedge funds.

In an SMA, the investor deals with accounting (including complex trade accounting on securities), not the investment manager. In a hedge fund, the investment manager is responsible for complicated investor-level accounting, and the fund sends investors a Schedule K-1 that is easy to input to tax returns.

There are several other issues to consider with SMAs vs. hedge funds; tax treatment is just one critical element. “SMAs provide transparency, and this is important to many clients, particularly tax-exempts or fiduciary accounts,” says NYC tax attorney Roger D. Lorence.

Roger D. Lorence contributed to this blog post.

 


How Traders Can Get 20% QBI Deduction Under IRS Proposed Regulations

August 15, 2018 | By: Robert A. Green, CPA | Read it on

See my March 5, 2019 blog post Uncertainty About Using QBI Tax Treatment For Traders.

The IRS recently released proposed reliance regulations (Proposed §1.199A) for the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s new 20% deduction on qualified business income (QBI) in pass-through entities.

The proposed regulations confirm that traders eligible for trader tax status (TTS) are a service business (SSTB). Upper-income SSTB owners won’t get a deduction on QBI if their taxable income (TI) exceeds the income cap of $415,000 married, and $207,500 for other taxpayers. The phase-out range is $100,000/$50,000 (married/other taxpayers) below the income cap, in which the QBI deduction phases out for SSTBs. The W-2 wage and property basis limitations apply within the phase-out range, too. Hedge funds eligible for TTS and investment managers are also SSTBs.

The new law favors non-service business (non-SSTB), which don’t have an income cap, but do have the W-2 wage and property basis limitations above the TI threshold of $315,000/$157,500 (married/other taxpayers). The 2018 TI income cap, phase-out range, and threshold will be adjusted for inflation in each subsequent year.

A critical question for traders
The proposed regulations do not answer this essential question: What types of trading income are included in QBI? The proposed regulations define a trading business, so I presume tax writers contemplated some types of ordinary income might be included in QBI. They probably wanted to limit tax benefits for traders by classifying trading as an SSTB subject to the income cap.

In my Jan. 12, 2018 blog post, How Traders Can Get The 20% QBI Deduction Under New Law, I explained how the statute excluded certain “investment-related” items from QBI, including capital gains, dividends, interest, annuities and foreign currency transactions. That left the door open for including Section 475 ordinary income for trading businesses. After reading the proposed regulations, I feel that door is still open.

Trading is a service business
See the proposed regulations, REG-107892-18, page 67. The Act just listed the word “trading,” whereas, the proposed regulations describe trading in detail and cite TTS court cases.

“b. Trading: Proposed §1.199A-5(b)(2)(xii) provides that any trade or business involving the “performance of services that consist of trading” means a trade or business of trading in securities, commodities, or partnership interests. Whether a person is a trader is determined taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances. Factors that have been considered relevant to determining whether a person is a trader include the source and type of profit generally sought from engaging in the activity regardless of whether the activity is being provided on behalf of customers or for a taxpayer’s own account. See Endicott v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2013-199; Nelson v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2013-259, King v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 445 (1987). A person that is a trader under these principles will be treated as performing the services of trading for purposes of section 199A(d)(2)(B).”

QBI excludes certain items
See REG-107892-18, page 30: “Section 199A(c)(3)(B) provides a list of items that are not taken into account as qualified items of income, gain, deduction, and loss, including capital gain or loss, dividends, interest income other than interest income properly allocable to a trade or business, amounts received from an annuity other than in connection with a trade or business, certain items described in section 954, and items of deduction or loss properly allocable to these items.”

See REG-107892-18, page 144: “Items not taken into account” in calculating QBI. Here’s an excerpt of the list.

 “(A) Any item of short-term capital gain, short-term capital loss, long-term capital gain, long-term capital loss, including any item treated as one of such items, such as gains or losses under section 1231 which are treated as capital gains or losses.

(B) Any dividend, income equivalent to a dividend, or payment in lieu of dividends.

(C) Any interest income other than interest income which is properly allocable to a trade or business. For purposes of section 199A and this section, interest income attributable to an investment of working capital, reserves, or similar accounts is not properly allocable to a trade or business.

(D) Any item of gain or loss described in section 954(c)(1)(C) (transactions in commodities) or section 954(c)(1)(D) (excess foreign currency gains) applied in each case by substituting “trade or business” for “controlled foreign corporation.”

(E) Any item of income, gain, deduction, or loss taken into account under section 954(c)(1)(F) (income from notional principal contracts) determined without regard to section 954(c)(1)(F)(ii) and other than items attributable to notional principal contracts entered into in transactions qualifying under section 1221(a)(7).

(F) Any amount received from an annuity which is not received in connection with the trade or business.”

Section 954 is for “foreign base company income,” and tax writers used it for convenience sake to define excluded items including transactions in commodities, foreign currencies (forex) and notional principal contracts (swaps). The latter two have ordinary income, but they are excluded from QBI.

Section 475 ordinary income
The new tax law excluded specific “investment-related” items from QBI. In earlier blog posts, I wondered if QBI might include “business-related” capital gains. The proposed regulations dropped the term “investment-related,” which seems to close that door of possibility.

I searched the QBI proposed regulations for “475,” and there were 20 results, and each instance defined securities or commodities using terminology in Section 475. None of the search results discussed 475 ordinary income and its impact on QBI. The proposed regulations seem to allow the inclusion of Section 475 ordinary income in QBI.

TTS traders are entitled to elect Section 475 on securities and/or commodities (including Section 1256 contracts). For existing taxpayers, a 2018 Section 475 election filing with the IRS was due by March 15, 2018, for partnerships and S-Corps, and by April 17, 2018, for individuals. New taxpayers (i.e., a new entity) may elect Section 475 internally within 75 days of inception. Section 475 is tax loss insurance: Exempting 475 trades from wash sale losses on securities and the $3,000 capital loss limitation. With the new tax law, there’s now likely a tax benefit on 475 income with the QBI deduction.

Section 1231 ordinary income
See REG-107892-18, page 37: “Exclusion from QBI for certain items.”

“a. Treatment of section 1231 gains and losses. (Excerpt)
Specifically, if gain or loss is treated as capital gain or loss under section 1231, it is not QBI. Conversely, if section 1231 provides that gains or losses are not treated as gains and losses from sales or exchanges of capital assets, section 199A(c)(3)(B)(i) does not apply and thus, the gains or losses must be included in QBI (provided all other requirements are met).”

If you overlay Section 475 on top of the above wording for Section 1231, there is a similar result: Section 475 ordinary income is not from the sale of a capital asset, and it should be included in QBI since it’s not expressly excluded.

Section 1231 is depreciable business or real property used for at least a year. A net Section 1231 loss is reported on Form 4797 Part II ordinary income or loss. Section 475 ordinary income or loss for TTS traders is reported on Form 4797 Part II, too. A net Section 1231 gain is a long-term capital gain.

Section 64 defines ordinary income
“The term ordinary income includes any gain from the sale or exchange of property which is neither a capital asset nor property described in section 1231(b). Any gain from the sale or exchange of property which is treated or considered, under other provisions of this subtitle, as ordinary income shall be treated as gain from the sale or exchange of property which is neither a capital asset nor property described in section 1231(b).”

The tax code does not define business income.

TTS traders with 475 ordinary income
A TTS trader, filing single, has QBI of $100,000 from Section 475 ordinary income, and his taxable income minus net capital gains is $80,000. He is under the TI threshold of $157,500 for single, so there is no phase-out of the deduction, and W-2 wage or property basis limitations do not apply. His deduction on QBI is $16,000 (20% x $80,000) since TI minus net capital gains is $80,000, which is lower than QBI of $100,000.

If his TI is greater than $157,500 but less than the income cap of $207,500 for a service business, then the deduction on QBI phases-out and the W-2 wage and property basis limitations apply inside the phase-out range.

If his TI is higher than the income cap of $207,500, there is no deduction on QBI in a trading service business.

Anti-abuse measures
The proposed regulations prevent “cracking and packing” schemes where an SSTB might contemplate spinning-off non-SSTBs to achieve a QBI deduction on them. “Proposed §1.199A-5(c)(2) provides that an SSTB includes any trade or business with 50 percent or more common ownership (directly or indirectly) that provides 80 percent or more of its property or services to an SSTB. Additionally, if a trade or business has 50 percent or more common ownership with an SSTB, to the extent that the trade or business provides property or services to the commonly-owned SSTB, the portion of the property or services provided to the SSTB will be treated as an SSTB (meaning the income will be treated as income from an SSTB).”

Other anti-abuse measures prevent employees from recasting themselves as independent contractors and then working for their ex-employer, which becomes their client.

Aggregation, allocation and QBI losses
There are QBI aggregation and allocation rules which come in handy for leveling out W-2 wage and property basis limitations among commonly owned non-SSTBs. If you own related businesses and one has too much payroll and property, and the other not enough, you don’t need to restructure to improve wage and property basis limitations. Aggregation rules allow you to combine QBI, wage and property basis limitations to maximize the deduction on aggregate QBI. Allocation rules are a different way to accomplish a similar result.

There are also rules for how to apply and allocate QBI losses to other businesses with QBI income and carrying over these losses to subsequent tax year(s).

Section 199A is a complicated code section requiring significant tax planning and compliance. The proposed regulations close loopholes, favor some types of businesses and prevent gaming of the system, which otherwise would invite excessive entity restructuring.

Hedge funds and investment managers
If a hedge fund qualifies for TTS, the fund is trading for its account through an investment manager partner. As a TTS trading business, the hedge fund is an SSTB.

A hedge fund with TTS is entitled to elect Section 475 ordinary income or loss. A hedge fund with TTS and Section 475 has ordinary income, which is likely includible in QBI. The SSTB taxable income thresholds and cap apply to each investor in the hedge fund; some may get a QBI deduction, whereas, others may not, depending on their TI, QBI aggregation and more.

The proposed regulations also describe investing and investment management as an SSTB (p. 66-67). I presume a carried-interest share (profit allocation) of capital gains should be excluded from QBI, but a carried-interest percentage of Section 475 ordinary income is likely included in QBI. Incentive fees and management fees are also included for management companies, which are SSTBs. QBI must be from domestic sources.

Service businesses
The proposed regulations state: “The definition of an SSTB for purposes of section 199A is (1) any trade or business involving the performance of services in the fields of health, law, accounting, actuarial science, performing arts, consulting, athletics, financial services, brokerage services, or any trade or business where the principal asset of such trade or business is the reputation or skill of one or more of its employees or owners, and (2) any trade or business that involves the performance of services that consist of investing and investment management, trading, or dealing in securities (as defined in section 475(c)(2)), partnership interests, or commodities (as defined in section 475(e)(2)).”

The proposed regulations exempted some types of service businesses from SSTBs, including real estate agents and brokers, insurance agents and brokers, property managers, and bankers taking deposits or making loans. It also narrowed SSTBs — for example, sales of medical equipment are not an SSTB, even though physician health care services are. Performing artists are service businesses, but not the maintenance and operation of equipment or facilities for use in the performing arts.

The proposed regulations significantly narrowed the catch-all category of SSTBs based on the “reputation and skill” of the owner. The updated definition is “(1) receiving income for endorsing products or services; (2) licensing or receiving income for the use of an individual’s image, likeness, name, signature, voice, trademark, or any other symbols associated with the individual’s identity; or (3) receiving appearance fees or income (including fees or income to reality performers performing as themselves on television, social media, or other forums, radio, television, and other media hosts, and video game players).”

Proposed vs. final regulations
The IRS stated that taxpayers are entitled to rely on these “proposed reliance regulations” pending finalization. The IRS is seeking comments, and they scheduled a public hearing for Oct. 16, 2018.

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was a significant piece of legislation for this Congress and President. I presume the IRS will attempt to issue final regulations in time for the 2018 tax-filing season, which starts in January 2019. The IRS needs to produce tax forms for the 2018 QBI deduction, and that is best accomplished after finalization of the regulations. Tax software makers need time to program these rules, too.

The new tax law reduced tax compliance for employees by suspending many itemized deductions. They may have a “postcard return.” However, the new law and proposed regulations significantly increase tax compliance for business owners, many of whom would like to get a 20% deduction on QBI in a pass-through entity.

See IRS FAQs and several examples on Basic questions and answers on new 20% deduction for pass-through businesses. 

Darren Neuschwander CPA contributed to my blog post.